Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of US policies and programs

被引:297
作者
Santelli, J
Ott, MA
Lyon, M
Rogers, J
Summers, D
Schleifer, R
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Heilbrunn Dept Populat & Family Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Adolescent Med, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Div Adolescent & Young Adult Med, Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Dept Pediat, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[5] Amer Coll Prevent Med, Washington, DC USA
[6] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Mt Sinai Hlth Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Human Rights Watch, New York, NY USA
关键词
abstinence; sex education; policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.10.006
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Abstinence from sexual intercourse is an important behavioral strategy for preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and pregnancy among adolescents. Many adolescents, including most younger adolescents, have not initiated sexual intercourse and many sexually experienced adolescents and young adults are abstinent for varying periods of time. There is broad support for abstinence as a necessary and appropriate part of sexuality education. Controversy arises when abstinence is provided to adolescents as a sole choice and where health information on other choices is restricted or misrepresented. Although abstinence is theoretically fully effective, in actual practice abstinence often fails to protect against pregnancy and STIs. Few Americans remain abstinent until marriage; many do not or cannot marry, and most initiate sexual intercourse and other sexual behaviors as adolescents. Although abstinence is a healthy behavioral option for teens, abstinence as a sole option for adolescents is scientifically and ethically problematic. A recent emphasis on abstinence-only programs and policies appears to be undermining more comprehensive sexuality education and other government-sponsored programs. We believe that abstinence-only education programs, as defined by federal funding requirements, are morally problematic, by withholding information and promoting questionable and inaccurate opinions. Abstinence-only programs threaten fundamental human rights to health, information, and life. (c) 2006 Society for Adolescent Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 81
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
*A GUTTM I, 1994, SEX AM TEEN
[2]  
ABMA JC, 2004, VITAL HLTH STAT, V23, P24, DOI DOI 10.1037/e609162007-001
[3]   PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS IN ABORTION - A REVIEW [J].
ADLER, NE ;
DAVID, HP ;
MAJOR, BN ;
ROTH, SH ;
RUSSO, NF ;
WYATT, GE .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 47 (10) :1194-1204
[4]   Abortion among adolescents [J].
Adler, NE ;
Ozer, EJ ;
Tschann, J .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 58 (03) :211-217
[5]  
*ADM CHILDR FAM, FISC YEAR 2005 ABST
[6]  
ALBERT B, 2004, AM OPINION TEEN PREG
[7]  
*AM MED ASS, 2003, 2003 14 SUPP SEX REP
[8]  
*AM MED ASS, 2004, H170968 AM MED ASS
[9]   Adverse childhood experiences and risk of paternity in teen pregnancy [J].
Anda, RF ;
Chapman, DP ;
Felitti, VJ ;
Edwards, V ;
Williamson, DF ;
Croft, JB ;
Giles, WH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (01) :37-45
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ACC COND HIV AIDS IN