Swarm intelligence and gravitational search algorithm for multi-objective optimization of synthesis gas production

被引:61
作者
Ganesan, T. [1 ]
Elamvazuthi, I. [2 ]
Shaari, Ku Zilati Ku [1 ]
Vasant, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Chem Engn, Tronoh 31750, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Tronoh 31750, Perak, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Fundamental & Appl Sci, Tronoh 31750, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
Synthesis gas; Multi-objective (MO); Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI); Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA); Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); Performance metrics; NORMAL-BOUNDARY INTERSECTION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; PARTIAL OXIDATION; METHANE; GENERATION; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.059
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the chemical industry, the production of methanol, ammonia, hydrogen and higher hydrocarbons require synthesis gas (or syn gas). The main three syn gas production methods are carbon dioxide reforming (CRM), steam reforming (SRM) and partial-oxidation of methane (POM). In this work, multi-objective (MO) optimization of the combined CRM and POM was carried out. The empirical model and the MO problem formulation for this combined process were obtained from previous works. The central objectives considered in this problem are methane conversion, carbon monoxide selectivity and the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio. The MO nature of the problem was tackled using the Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI) method. Two techniques (Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)) were then applied in conjunction with the NBI method. The performance of the two algorithms and the quality of the solutions were gauged by using two performance metrics. Comparative studies and results analysis were then carried out on the optimization results. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 374
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Optimization of tri-reformer reactor to produce synthesis gas for methanol production using differential evolution (DE) method [J].
Aboosadi, Z. Arab ;
Jahanmiri, A. H. ;
Rahimpour, M. R. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (08) :2691-2701
[2]  
[Anonymous], MULTICRITERIA OPTIMI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Genetic programming IV: routine human-competitive machine intelligence
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT J MODEL SIMUL SC
[5]   CARBON DEPOSITION IN STEAM REFORMING AND METHANATION [J].
BARTHOLOMEW, CH .
CATALYSIS REVIEWS-SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1982, 24 (01) :67-112
[6]  
Chen W.-H., 2012, APPL ENERGY
[7]  
Colorni A., 1991, Distributed optimization by ant colonies, V142, P134
[8]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[9]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69
[10]  
Eschenauer H., 1990, Multicriteria design optimization: procedures and applications