Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

被引:1625
作者
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. [1 ]
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge [3 ]
Maas, Kirsten W. [1 ]
Bonavina, Luigi [5 ]
Rosman, Camiel [6 ]
Roig Garcia, Josep [7 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. [1 ]
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. [3 ]
Hollmann, Markus W. [4 ]
de lange, Elly S. M. [2 ]
Bonjer, H. Jaap [1 ]
van der Peet, Donald L. [1 ]
Cuesta, Miguel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Milan, Dept Surg, Ist Ricovero & Cura, Carattere Sci Policlin San Donato, Milan, Italy
[6] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Hosp Univ Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Dept Surg, Girona, Spain
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXTENDED TRANSTHORACIC RESECTION; PRONE; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; MOBILIZATION; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Surgical resection is regarded as the only curative option for resectable oesophageal cancer, but pulmonary complications occurring in more than half of patients after open oesophagectomy are a great concern. We assessed whether minimally invasive oesophagectomy reduces morbidity compared with open oesophagectomy. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at five study centres in three countries between June 1, 2009, and March 31, 2011. Patients aged 18-75 years with resectable cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive either open transthoracic or minimally invasive transthoracic oesophagectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, and investigators undertaking interventions, assessing outcomes, and analysing data, were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was pulmonary infection within the first 2 weeks after surgery and during the whole stay in hospital. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR TC 2452. Findings We randomly assigned 56 patients to the open oesophagectomy group and 59 to the minimally invasive oesophagectomy group. 16 (29%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in the first 2 weeks compared with five (9%) in the minimally invasive group (relative risk [RR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.76; p=0.005). 19 (34%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in-hospital compared with seven (12%) in the minimally invasive group (0.35, 0.16-0.78; p = 0.005). For in-hospital mortality, one patient in the open oesophagectomy group died from anastomotic leakage and two in the minimally invasive group from aspiration and mediastinitis after anastomotic leakage. Interpretation These findings provide evidence for the short-term benefits of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1887 / 1892
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]
[Anonymous], J INT COLL SURG
[3]
Biere SSAY, 2009, MINERVA CHIR, V64, P121
[4]
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial) [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Sosef, Meindert N. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Peet, Donald L. .
BMC SURGERY, 2011, 11
[5]
Biere Surya S A Y, 2010, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V154, pA820
[6]
Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer [J].
Blazeby, JM ;
Conroy, T ;
Hammerlid, E ;
Fayers, P ;
Sezer, O ;
Koller, M ;
Arraras, J ;
Bottomley, A ;
Vickery, CW ;
Etienne, PL ;
Alderson, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (10) :1384-1394
[7]
Cuschieri A, 1994, Endosc Surg Allied Technol, V2, P21
[8]
Quality of life after transhiatal compared with extended transthoracic resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [J].
de Boer, AGEM ;
van Lanschot, JJB ;
van Sandick, JW ;
Hulscher, JBF ;
Stalmeier, PFM ;
de Haes, JCJM ;
Tilanus, HW ;
Obertop, H ;
Sprangers, MAG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (20) :4202-4208
[9]
Medical progress - Esophageal cancer [J].
Enzinger, PC ;
Mayer, RJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (23) :2241-2252
[10]
Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions [J].
Fabian, Thomas ;
Martin, Jeremiah ;
Katigbak, Mario ;
McKelvey, Alicia A. ;
Federico, John A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (11) :2485-2491