A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis: unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pedicle screws and 2 cages Clinical article

被引:65
作者
Aoki, Yasuchika [1 ,2 ]
Yamagata, Masatsune [2 ]
Ikeda, Yoshikazu [2 ]
Nakajima, Fumitake [2 ]
Ohtori, Seiji [3 ]
Nakagawa, Koichi [1 ]
Nakajima, Arata [1 ]
Toyone, Tomoaki [4 ]
Orita, Sumihisa [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuhisa [3 ]
机构
[1] Toho Univ, Sakura Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sakura, Chiba 2858741, Japan
[2] Chiba Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chiba, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chiba, Japan
[4] Teikyo Univ, Chiba Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chiba, Japan
关键词
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; unilateral approach; pedicle screw; cage; degenerative spondylolisthesis; lumbar spine; ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; POSTERIOR MIGRATION; FOLLOW-UP; MINI-OPEN; FIXATION; REDUCTION; SPINE;
D O I
10.3171/2012.5.SPINE111044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Object. Many surgeons currently prefer to use transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), placing 1 unilateral pedicle screw (PS) and 1 cage. However, no study has examined whether unilateral fixation improves surgical outcome. The authors conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial with a minimum 2-year follow-up to analyze TLIF outcomes for 2 techniques: placement of a unilateral PS and a cage compared with placement of bilateral PSs and 2 cages. Methods. Fifty patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing single-level TLIF were randomly assigned to receive either unilateral or bilateral fixation. Parameters compared between the groups were surgical invasiveness, severity of intermittent claudication, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores (from 0 to 10 for back pain, lower-extremity pain, and lower-extremity numbness), postoperative disability scores for lumbar spinal disorders (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire [JOABPEQ]), and fusion rates. Results. The mean operative time for TLIF was significantly (p = 0.05) shorter and mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the unilateral than in the bilateral group. Intermittent claudication improved in response to each technique, but there was no significant intergroup difference. The unilateral group had a nonsignificant tendency toward less improvement in VAS score for back pain (1.5 vs 3.7 for the bilateral group) and exhibited significantly less improvement in VAS score for lower-extremity pain (2.1 vs 5.1, respectively) and numbness (1.7 vs 4.4). There were no significant differences between the groups in postsurgical scores for all 5 items of the JOABPEQ. The fusion rates were 87.5% (21 of 24 patients) in the unilateral group and 95.7% (22 of 23) in the bilateral group. Conclusions. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion involving unilateral PS fixation and a single-cage technique is less invasive than a 2-cage technique and bilateral fixation, and it improved patients' symptoms. However, it resulted in less improvement in back pain, lower-extremity pain, and lower-extremity numbness. When considering unilateral PS fixation and a single cage, the surgeon should be aware of the potential limitations of this technique. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000007833 (UMIN). (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.5.SPINE111044)
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Patient satisfaction and radiographic outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion without iliac crest bone graft or transverse process fusion [J].
Acosta, Frank L. ;
Cloyd, Jordan M. ;
Aryan, Henry E. ;
Ames, Christopher P. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 16 (09) :1184-1187
[2]
Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation Clinical article [J].
Aoki, Yasuchika ;
Yamagata, Masatsune ;
Nakajima, Fumitake ;
Ikeda, Yoshikazu ;
Smmizu, Koh ;
Yoshihara, Masakazu ;
Iwasaki, Junichi ;
Toyone, Tomoaki ;
Nakagawa, Koichi ;
Nakajima, Arata ;
Takahashi, Kazuhisa ;
Ohtori, Seiji .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (03) :381-387
[3]
Posterior Migration of Fusion Cages in Degenerative Lumbar Disease Treated With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Report of Three Patients [J].
Aoki, Yasuchika ;
Yamagata, Masatsune ;
Nakajima, Fumitake ;
Ikeda, Yoshikazu ;
Takahashi, Kazuhisa .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (01) :E54-E58
[4]
Beringer Will F, 2006, Neurosurg Focus, V20, pE4
[5]
TREATMENT OF SEVERE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS BY REDUCTION AND PEDICULAR FIXATION - A 4-6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
BOOS, N ;
MARCHESI, D ;
ZUBER, K ;
AEBI, M .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (12) :1655-1661
[6]
Brantigan John W, 2003, Spine J, V3, P186, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00536-3
[7]
Six-Year Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis with Use of Interbody Fusion Cages and Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Gornet, Matthew F. ;
Shuler, Thomas C. ;
Kleeman, Thomas J. ;
Zdeblick, Thomas A. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (05) :1181-1189
[8]
Biomechanical Analysis and Review of Lateral Lumbar Fusion Constructs [J].
Cappuccino, Andrew ;
Cornwall, G. Bryan ;
Turner, Alexander W. L. ;
Fogel, Guy R. ;
Duong, Huy T. ;
Kim, Kee D. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) :S361-S367
[9]
Evaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine [J].
Chang, Ti-Sheng ;
Chang, Jia-Hao ;
Wang, Chien-Shiung ;
Chen, Hung-Yi ;
Cheng, Ching-Wei .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2010, 5