On regularized time varying gravity field models based on grace data and their comparison with hydrological models

被引:11
作者
Eshagh, Mehdi [1 ,2 ]
Lemoine, Jean-Michel [3 ]
Gegout, Pascal [3 ]
Biancale, Richard [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Div Geodesy & Geoinformat, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Geodesy, Tehran, Iran
[3] French Space Agcy CNES, Dept Space Geodesy GRGS, Toulouse, France
关键词
gravity field and climate experiment; hydrological model; inversion; range-rate; smoothing; PARAMETERS; INVERSION; OCEAN;
D O I
10.2478/s11600-012-0053-5
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Determination of spherical harmonic coefficients of the Earth's gravity field is often an ill-posed problem and leads to solving an ill-conditioned system of equations. Inversion of such a system is critical, as small errors of data will yield large variations in the result. Regularization is a method to solve such an unstable system of equations. In this study, direct methods of Tikhonov, truncated and damped singular value decomposition and iterative methods of nu, algebraic reconstruction technique, range restricted generalized minimum residual and conjugate gradient are used to solve the normal equations constructed based on range rate data of the gravity field and climate experiment (GRACE) for specific periods. Numerical studies show that the Tikhonov regularization and damped singular value decomposition methods for which the regularization parameter is estimated using quasioptimal criterion deliver the smoothest solutions. Each regularized solution is compared to the global land data assimilation system (GLDAS) hydrological model. The Tikhonov regularization with L-curve delivers a solution with high correlation with this model and a relatively small standard deviation over oceans. Among iterative methods, conjugate gradient is the most suited one for the same reasons and it has the shortest computation time.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], REPORTS FINNISH GEOD
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PARAMETER ESTIMATION, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2015-0-02458-3
[3]   CNES/GRGS 10-day gravity field models (release 2) and their evaluation [J].
Bruinsma, Sean ;
Lemoine, Jean-Michel ;
Biancale, Richard ;
Vales, Nicole .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2010, 45 (04) :587-601
[4]   Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing -: comparisons with observations -: art. no. 1275 [J].
Carrère, L ;
Lyard, F .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (06) :8-1
[5]  
DOSSANTOS MC, 1995, 178 U NEW BRUNSW DEP
[6]   SIMPLIFICATION OF GEOPOTENTIAL PERTURBING FORCE ACTING ON A SATELLITE [J].
Eshagh, M. ;
Abdollahzadeh, M. ;
Najafi-Alamdari, M. .
ARTIFICIAL SATELLITES-JOURNAL OF PLANETARY GEODESY, 2008, 43 (02) :45-64
[7]   INVERSION OF GRAVITY GRADIENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF GRAVITY ANOMALY IN THE POLAR GAPS [J].
Eshagh, M. .
ACTA GEODAETICA ET GEOPHYSICA HUNGARICA, 2010, 45 (04) :440-451
[8]  
Eshagh M., 2011, ZtV, V136, P113
[9]   Determination of gravity anomaly at sea level from inversion of satellite gravity gradiometric data [J].
Eshagh, Mehdi ;
Sjoberg, Lars E. .
JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2011, 51 (05) :366-377
[10]   Regularization tools version 4.0 for matlab 7.3 [J].
Hansen, Per Christian .
NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2007, 46 (02) :189-194