Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry

被引:311
作者
Clemens, J
Trimborn, M
Weiland, P
Amon, B
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Plant Nutr, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
[2] Fed Agr Res Ctr, Inst Technol & Biosyst Engn, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, Div Agr Engn, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
biogas; greenhouse gases; nitrous oxide; methane; ammonia; slurry; manure management;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Biogas treatment of animal manures is an upcoming technology because it is a way of producing renewable energy (biogas). However, little is known about effects of this management strategy on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during fermentation, storage, and field application of the substrates compared to untreated slurries. In this study, we compared cattle slurry and cattle slurry with potato starch as additive during the process of fermentation, during storage and after field application. The addition of potato starch strongly enhanced CH4 production from 4230 I CH4 m(-3) to 8625 I CH4 m(-3) in the fermenter at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 29 days. Extending the HRT to 56 days had only a small effect on the CH4 production. Methane emissions from stored slurry depended on storage temperature and were highest from unfermented slurry followed by the slurry/starch mixture. Gas emissions from untreated and fermented slurry during storage were further analyzed in a pilot-scale experiment with different levels of covering such as straw cover, a wooden lid and no cover. Emissions of greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O, NH3) were in the range of 14.3-17.1 kg CO2 eq. m(-3) during winter (100 day storage period) and 40.5-90.5 kg CO2 eq. m-3 during summer (140 day storage period). A straw cover reduced NH3 losses, but not overall GHG emissions, whereas a solid cover reduced CH4 and NH3 emissions. After field application, there were no significant differences between slurry types in GHG emissions (4.15-8.12 kg CO2 eq. m(-3) a(-1)). GHG emissions from slurry stores were more important than emissions after field application. Co-digestion of slurry with additives such as starch has a large potential to substitute fossil energy by biogas. On a biogas plant, slurry stores should be covered gas-tight in order to eliminate GHG emissions and collect CH4 for electricity production. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AMON B, 2004, QUANTITATIVE EFFECTS
[2]  
AMON B, 1999, VEREIN DTSCH INGENIE
[3]  
[Anonymous], METHANE NITROUS OXID
[4]   The effect of biological oxygen demand of cattle slurry and soil moisture on nitrous oxide emissions [J].
Clemens, J ;
Huschka, A .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 59 (02) :193-198
[5]  
De Bode M. J. C., 1991, Odour and ammonia emissions from livestock farming. Proceedings of a seminar, Silsoe, UK, 26-28 March l990.., P59
[6]   DYNAMICS OF AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION DURING FURROW IRRIGATION OF MAIZE [J].
DENMEAD, OT ;
FRENEY, JR ;
SIMPSON, JR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (01) :149-155
[7]  
ELLENBERG H, 1992, AMMONIAK UMWELT
[8]   Laboratory estimates of trace gas emissions following surface application and injection of cattle slurry [J].
Flessa, H ;
Beese, F .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (01) :262-268
[9]  
Hilhorst M.A., 2001, EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES, P1
[10]  
Houghton J. T., 1996, SCI CLIMATE CHANGE, P572