ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay - II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel

被引:96
作者
Dean, JH
Twerdok, LE
Tice, RR
Sailstad, DM
Hattan, DG
Stokes, WS
机构
[1] Sanofi Synthelabo Inc, Sanofi Synthelabo Res, Malvern, PA 19355 USA
[2] Amer Petr Inst, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[3] NIEHS, Natl Toxicol Program, Interagcy Ctr Evaluat Alternat Toxicol Methods, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[4] ILS Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[5] US EPA, Expt Toxicol Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[6] US FDA, Ctr Food Safety & Appl Nutr, Washington, DC 20205 USA
关键词
allergic contact dermatitis; local lymph node assay; guinea pig; mice;
D O I
10.1006/rtph.2001.1497
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The validation status of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA), a method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals, was evaluated by an independent peer review panel (Panel) convened by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). The LLNA measures lymphocyte proliferation using incorporation of radioactive thymidine or iododeoxyuridine into cells of the draining lymph nodes of mice topically exposed to a test article. The Panel concluded that the assay performed as well as currently accepted guinea pig methods [guinea pig maximization test (GPMT)/Buehler assay (BA)] for the hazard identification of strong to moderate chemical sensitizing agents, but that it might not correctly identify all weak sensitizers or metals (potential false negative response) or all strong irritants (potential false positive response). The Panel concluded also that the LLNA involves less pain and distress than conventional guinea pig methods. The Panel unanimously recommended the LLNA as a stand-alone alternative for contact sensitization hazard assessment, provided that certain protocol modifications were made. These included collection of individual, rather than pooled, animal response data; the inclusion of a concurrent positive control; and consideration of dose-response information and statistical analyses. A standardized LLNA protocol is provided. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 273
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Local lymph node activation and IgE responses in Brown Norway and Wistar rats after dermal application of sensitizing and non-sensitizing chemicals [J].
Arts, JHE ;
Droge, SCM ;
Spanhaak, S ;
Bloksma, N ;
Penninks, AH ;
Kuper, CF .
TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 117 (2-3) :229-237
[2]   Local lymph node activation in rats after dermal application of the sensitizers 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene and trimellitic anhydride [J].
Arts, JHE ;
Droge, SCM ;
Bloksma, N ;
Kuper, CF .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 34 (01) :55-62
[3]  
*ASTM, 1992, STAND PRACT COND INT, P426
[4]  
Basketter D A, 1999, Am J Contact Dermat, V10, P207
[5]  
Basketter D.A., 1991, TOXICOL MECH METHOD, V1, P30, DOI DOI 10.3109/15376519109036523
[6]   COMPARISON OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH THE GUINEA-PIG MAXIMIZATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF A RANGE OF CONTACT ALLERGENS [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :65-69
[7]   THE PERFORMANCE OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY WITH CHEMICALS IDENTIFIED AS CONTACT ALLERGENS IN THE HUMAN MAXIMIZATION TEST [J].
BASKETTER, DA ;
SCHOLES, EW ;
KIMBER, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (06) :543-547
[8]   Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 36 (04) :327-333
[9]   The local lymph node assay: A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I ;
Loveless, SE .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 34 (10) :985-997
[10]   Skin sensitization to linalyl hydroperoxide: Support for radical intermediates [J].
Bezard, M ;
Karlberg, AT ;
Montelius, J ;
Lepoittevin, JP .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 10 (09) :987-993