Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:220
作者
Bikson, Marom [1 ]
Rahman, Asif [1 ]
Datta, Abhishek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Lab Neuromodulat, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
tDCS; transcranial electrical stimulation; computer model; forward model; FEM; current flow; electric field; current density; MOTOR CORTEX; ELECTRICAL-FIELD; DC STIMULATION; BRAIN; EXCITABILITY; ELECTRODES; TDCS; FOCALITY; FEM;
D O I
10.1177/1550059412445138
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
During transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), controllable dose parameters are electrode number (typically 1 anode and 1 cathode), position, size, shape, and applied electric current. Because different electrode montages result in distinct brain current flow patterns across the brain, tDCS dose parameters can be adjusted, in an application-specific manner, to target or avoid specific brain regions. Though the tDCS electrode montage often follows basic rules of thumb (increased/decreased excitability "under" the anode/cathode electrode), computational forward models of brain current flow provide more accurate insight into detailed current flow patterns and, in some cases, can even challenge simplified electrode-placement assumptions. With the increased recognized value of computational forward models in informing tDCS montage design and interpretation of results, there have been recent advances in modeling tools and a greater proliferation of publications. In addition, the importance of customizing tDCS for potentially vulnerable populations (eg, skull defects, brain damage/stroke, and extremes of age) can be considered. Finally, computational models can be used to design new electrode montages, for example, to improve spatial targeting such as high-definition tDCS. Pending further validation and dissemination of modeling tools, computational forward models of neuromodulation will become standard tools to guide the optimization of clinical trials and electrotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 183
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Antal A, 2008, CEREB CORTEX, V18, P2701, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhn032
[2]
Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro [J].
Bikson, M ;
Inoue, M ;
Akiyama, H ;
Deans, JK ;
Fox, JE ;
Miyakawa, H ;
Jefferys, JGR .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2004, 557 (01) :175-190
[3]
Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of "return" electrode's position and size [J].
Bikson, M. ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Rahman, Asif ;
Scaturro, Jen .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (12) :1976-1978
[4]
Bikson M, 2011, BRAIN STIMU IN PRESS
[5]
Brunoni AR, 2011, BRAIN STIMU IN PRESS
[6]
Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Elwassif, Maged ;
Battaglia, Fortunato ;
Bikson, Marom .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 (02) :163-174
[7]
Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Baker, Julie M. ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Fridriksson, Julius .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2011, 4 (03) :169-174
[8]
Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: High-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Fregni, Felipe .
NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 52 (04) :1268-1278
[9]
Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad [J].
Datta, Abhishek ;
Bansal, Varun ;
Diaz, Julian ;
Patel, Jinal ;
Reato, Davide ;
Bikson, Marom .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) :201-207
[10]
Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target [J].
Dmochowski, Jacek P. ;
Datta, Abhishek ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Su, Yuzhuo ;
Parra, Lucas C. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (04)