Disparities in Liver Transplantation Before and After Introduction of the MELD Score

被引:279
作者
Moylan, Cynthia A. [1 ]
Brady, Carla W. [1 ]
Johnson, Jeffrey L. [2 ]
Smith, Alastair D. [1 ]
Tuttle-Newhall, Janet E. [3 ]
Muir, Andrew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gen Surg & Crit Care, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2008年 / 300卷 / 20期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.2008.720
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context In February 2002, the allocation system for liver transplantation became based on the Model for End- Stage Liver Disease ( MELD) score. Before MELD, black patients were more likely to die or become too sick to undergo liver transplantation compared with white patients. Little information exists regarding sex and access to liver transplantation. Objective To determine the association between race, sex, and liver transplantation following introduction of the MELD system. Design, Setting, and Patients A retrospective cohort of black and white patients ( >= 18 years) registered on the United Network for Organ Sharing liver transplantation waiting list between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2000 ( pre- MELD cohort, n= 21 895) and between February 28, 2002, and March 31, 2006 ( post- MELD cohort, n= 23 793). Main Outcome Measures Association between race, sex, and receipt of a liver transplant. Separate multivariable analyses evaluated cohorts within each period to identify predictors of time to death and the odds of dying or receiving liver transplantation within 3 years of listing. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzed separately. Results Black patients were younger ( mean [ SD], 49.2 [ 10.7] vs 52.4 [ 9.2] years; P <. 001) and sicker ( MELD score at listing: median [ interquartile range], 16 [ 12- 22] vs 14 [ 11- 19]; P <. 001) than white patients on the waiting list for both periods. In the pre- MELD cohort, black patients were more likely to die or become too sick for liver transplantation than white patients ( 27.0% vs 21.7%) within 3 years of registering on the waiting list ( odds ratio [ OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval ( CI), 1.15- 1.98; P=. 003). In the post- MELD cohort, black race was no longer associated with increased likelihood of death or becoming too sick for liver transplantation ( 26.5% vs 22.0%, respectively; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.74- 1.26; P=. 76). Black patients were also less likely to receive a liver transplant than white patients within 3 years of registering on the waiting list pre- MELD ( 61.6% vs 66.9%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59- 0.97; P=. 03), whereas post- MELD, race was no longer significantly associated with receipt of a liver transplant ( 47.5% vs 45.5%, respectively; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84- 1.28; P=. 75). Women were more likely than men to die or become too sick for liver transplantation post-MELD ( 23.7% vs 21.4%; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08- 1.47; P=. 003) vs pre- MELD ( 22.4% vs 21.9%; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.91- 1.26; P=. 37). Similarly, women were less likely than men to receive a liver transplant within 3 years both pre- MELD ( 64.8% vs 67.6%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70- 0.92; P=. 002) and post- MELD ( 39.9% vs 48.7%; OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62- 0.79; P <. 001). Conclusion Following introduction of the MELD score to the liver transplantation allocation system, race was no longer associated with receipt of a liver transplant or death on the waiting list, but disparities based on sex remain.
引用
收藏
页码:2371 / 2378
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Differences in access to liver transplantation: Disease severity, waiting time, and transplantation center volume [J].
Ahmad, Jawad ;
Bryce, Cindy L. ;
Cacciarelli, Thomas ;
Roberts, Mark S. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 146 (10) :707-713
[2]  
Allison PD., 2010, SURVIVAL ANAL USING
[3]  
[Anonymous], ORG PROC TRANSPL ASS
[4]   Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas [J].
Axelrod, David A. ;
Guidinger, Mary K. ;
Finlayson, Samuel ;
Schaubel, Douglas E. ;
Goodman, David C. ;
Chobanian, Michael ;
Merion, Robert M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (02) :202-207
[5]   Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region [J].
Barshes, Neal R. ;
Becker, Natasha S. ;
Washburn, W. Kenneth ;
Halff, Glenn A. ;
Aloia, Thomas A. ;
Goss, John A. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 13 (05) :747-751
[6]   Primary liver cancer:: Worldwide incidence and trends [J].
Bosch, FX ;
Ribes, J ;
Díaz, M ;
Cléries, R .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 127 (05) :S5-S16
[7]   Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores - A systematic bias [J].
Cholongitas, E. ;
Marelli, L. ;
Kerry, A. ;
Goodier, D. W. ;
Nair, D. ;
Thomas, M. ;
Patch, D. ;
Burroughs, A. K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :685-692
[8]   Race: A critical factor in organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation? [J].
Eckhoff, DE ;
McGuire, BM ;
Young, CJ ;
Sellers, MT ;
Frenette, LR ;
Hudson, SL ;
Contreras, JL ;
Bynon, S .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION AND SURGERY, 1998, 4 (06) :499-505
[9]   Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States [J].
El-Serag, HB ;
Mason, AC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10) :745-750
[10]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509