Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using cadence-contrast pulse sequencing technology for targeted biopsy of the prostate

被引:77
作者
Aigner, Friedrich [1 ]
Pallwein, Leo [1 ]
Mitterberger, Michael [2 ]
Pinggera, Germar M. [2 ]
Mikuz, Gregor [3 ]
Horninger, Wolfgang [2 ]
Frauscher, Ferdinand [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Radiol 2, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Urol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Pathol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
prostate cancer; detection; biopsy; pathological analysis; ultrasonography; contrast agent; CANCER-DETECTION; PERIPHERAL ZONE; CORE BIOPSIES; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; SONOGRAPHY; PROTOCOL; IMPACT; AGENTS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08038.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
To evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) using cadence-contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) technology, compared with systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer, as grey-scale US has low sensitivity and specificity for detecting prostate cancer. In all, 44 men with suspicious prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and CPS findings were assessed; all had CPS-targeted and systematic biopsy. Transrectal CPS images were taken with a low mechanical index (0.14). A microbubble contrast agent (SonoVue, Bracco International BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was administered as a bolus, with a maximum dose of 4.8 mL. CPS was used to assess prostatic vascularity. Areas with a rapid and increased contrast enhancement within the peripheral zone were defined as suspicious for prostate cancer. Up to five CPS targeted biopsies were taken and subsequently a 10-core systematic biopsy was taken. Cancer detection rates for the two techniques were compared. Overall, cancer was detected in 35 of 44 patients (80%), with a mean PSA level of 3.8 ng/mL. Lesions suspicious on CPS showed cancer in 35 of 44 patients (80%) and systematic biopsy detected cancer in 15 of 44 patients (34%). CPS-targeted cores were positive in 105 of 220 cores (47.7%) and in 41 of 440 systematic biopsy cores (9.3%) (P < 0.001). Lesions suspicious on CPS were false-positive in nine of 44 patients (20%). The mean Gleason score for systematic biopsy was 6.7 and for CPS-targeted biopsy 6.8 (P > 0.05). The sensitivity of CPS for detecting cancer was 100% (confidence interval, 95%). However, limitations in the series included that only CPS-positive cases were investigated, and CPS-targeted biopsy should be evaluated in a more extended biopsy scheme. Contrast-enhanced US using CPS enables excellent visualization of the microvasculature associated with prostate cancer, and can improve the detection of prostate cancer compared with systematic biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer [J].
Aus, G ;
Abbou, CC ;
Bolla, M ;
Heidenreich, A ;
Schmid, HP ;
van Poppel, H ;
Wolff, J ;
Zattoni, F .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (04) :546-551
[2]
Evaluation of cerebral perfusion deficit in stroke patients using new transcranial contrast imaging CPS™ technology -: Preliminary results [J].
Bartels, E ;
Henning, S ;
Wellmer, A ;
Giraldo-Velásquez, M ;
Kermer, P .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2005, 26 (06) :478-486
[3]
Incidental liver lesions: diagnostic value of cadence contrast pulse sequencing (CPS) and SonoVue [J].
Bleuzen, A ;
Tranquart, F .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 :P53-P62
[4]
Microvessel density predicts survival in prostate cancer patients subjected to watchful waiting [J].
Borre, M ;
Offersen, BV ;
Nerstrom, B ;
Overgaard, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (07) :940-944
[5]
Optimized microvessel density analysis improves prediction of cancer stage from prostate needle biopsies [J].
Bostwick, DG ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Blute, M ;
Barrett, DM ;
MacLennan, GT ;
Sebo, TJ ;
Scardino, PT ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Hudson, MA ;
Fradet, Y ;
Miller, GJ ;
Crawford, ED ;
Blumenstein, BA ;
Mahran, HE ;
Miles, BJ .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (01) :47-57
[6]
Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection [J].
Chang, JJ ;
Shinohara, K ;
Bhargava, V ;
Presti, JC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) :2111-2114
[7]
Cookson MS, 2000, MOL UROL, V4, P93
[8]
DAHNERT WF, 1986, RADIOLOGY, V158, P97
[9]
Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis [J].
Engelbrecht, MR ;
Jager, GJ ;
Laheij, RJ ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
van Lier, HJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) :2294-2302
[10]
Eskew LA, 1997, J UROLOGY, V157, P203