Posterior ankle arthroscopy - An anatomic study

被引:80
作者
Sitler, DF [1 ]
Amendola, A
Bailey, CS
Thain, LMF
Spouge, A
机构
[1] USN, Med Ctr, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Fowler Kennedy Sport Med Clin, 3M Ctr, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2106/00004623-200205000-00010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ankle arthroscopy has generally been performed with use of anterior portals with the patient in the supine position. Little has been published on ankle arthroscopy performed with use of posterior portals, particularly with the patient in the prone position. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of ankle arthroscopy with use of posterior portals with the limb in the prone position. Methods: Thirteen fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were used. Posterolateral and posteromedial portals were established. Arthroscopy was performed, and the extent of the talar dome that could be visualized was marked. Four-millimeter plastic cannulae were filled with oil and were placed in the portals for use as reference landmarks on magnetic resonance imaging studies. The proximity of the portal cannulae to the adjacent structures was measured on standard magnetic resonance images and then during careful dissection. The distances measured by dissection were compared with the measurements made on magnetic resonance images. Results: An average of 54% (range, 42% to 73%) of the talar dome could be visualized. The average distance between a cannula and adjacent anatomic structures after dissection was 3.2 mm (range, 0 to 8.9 mm) to the sural nerve, 4.8 mm (range, 0 to 11.0 mm) to the small saphenous vein, 6.4 mm (range, 0 to 16.2 mm) to the tibial nerve, 9.6 mm (range, 2.4 to 20.1 mm) to the posterior tibial artery, 17 mm (range, 19 to 31 mm) to the medial calcaneal nerve, and 2.7 mm (range, 0 to 11.2 mm) to the flexor hallucis longus tendon. The magnetic resonance images demonstrated very similar distances except in the case of the distance between the posteromedial cannula and the tibial nerve, which often was difficult to specifically identify on magnetic resonance imaging studies. Conclusions: The findings of the present cadaveric study suggest that, with the patient in the prone position, arthroscopic equipment may be introduced into the posterior aspect of the ankle without gross injury to the posterior neurovascular structures. Limited clinical trials should be carried out to confirm this finding.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 769
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Ankle arthroscopy: Outcome in 79 consecutive patients [J].
Amendola, A ;
Petrik, J ;
WebsterBogaert, S .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (05) :565-573
[2]
ARTHROSCOPY OF THE ANKLE - TECHNIQUE AND NORMAL ANATOMY [J].
ANDREWS, JR ;
PREVITE, WJ ;
CARSON, WG .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1985, 6 (01) :29-33
[3]
COMPLICATIONS OF ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY [J].
BARBER, FA ;
CLICK, J ;
BRITT, BT .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1990, 10 (05) :263-266
[4]
An anatomical study of a new portal for ankle arthroscopy [J].
Buckingham, RA ;
Winson, IG ;
Kelly, AJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (04) :650-652
[5]
Burman MS, 1931, J BONE JOINT SURG, V13, P669
[6]
Drez D Jr, 1981, Foot Ankle, V2, P138
[7]
ANATOMIC STUDY OF ARTHROSCOPIC PORTAL SITES OF THE ANKLE [J].
FEIWELL, LA ;
FREY, C .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1993, 14 (03) :142-147
[8]
Ferkel R, 1996, ARTHROSCOPIC SURG FO, V15, P291
[9]
Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy [J].
Ferkel, RD ;
Heath, DD ;
Guhl, JF .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1996, 12 (02) :200-208
[10]
FERKEL RD, 1994, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V25, P17