How departments of economics evaluate teaching

被引：71

作者：

Becker, WE ^{[1
]}

Watts, M

机构：

[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Econ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA

[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Int Business, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA

来源：

AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW | 1999年 / 89卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1257/aer.89.2.344

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：344 / 349

页数：6

共 9 条

[1]

Cashin W. E., 1990, STUDENT RATINGS INST, P113

[2] Navigating student ratings of instruction [J].

dApollonia, S ;

Abrami, PC .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (11) :1198-1208

[3] Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings [J].

Greenwald, AG ;

Gillmore, GM .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (11) :1209-1217

[4] Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective - The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility [J].

Marsh, HW ;

Roche, LA .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (11) :1187-1197

[5] Student ratings - The validity of use [J].

McKeachie, WJ .

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (11) :1218-1225

[6]

WALSTAD W, 1998, TEACHING UNDERGRADUA, P337

[7]

WHITE NE, 1995, CAM ASTROPH, V26, P1

[8]

WILLIAMS WM, 1997, CHANGE, V29, P13

[9]

WILSON R, 1998, CHRON HIGHER EDUC, V44, pA12

← 1 →