Guidelines recommendations on care of adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: A systematic review of global practices

被引:44
作者
Dreesen, Mira [1 ]
Foulon, Veerle [2 ]
Vanhaecht, Kris [3 ]
De Pourcq, Lutgart [1 ]
Hiele, Martin [4 ]
Willems, Ludo [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, Dept Pharm, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Pharm, Res Ctr Pharmaceut Care & Pharmacoecon, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Serv & Nursing Res, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Home parenteral nutrition; Practice guidelines; Adults; METABOLIC BONE-DISEASE; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clnu.2012.02.013
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background & aims: Because home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in adult patients can give rise to a variety of complications, good guidance is necessary. To achieve this, clarity and consistency in guidelines are essential. The aim of this review is to identify and compare evidence-based guidelines, and to compile a list of main recommendations, according to their evidence-based grade. Methods: We searched Medline and the international guideline database for HPN guidelines, performed a content analysis of retrieved guidelines, and evaluated their quality. We then compiled a comparative table of guideline recommendations along with their assigned level of evidence. Summary of results: Six systematically developed evidence-based guidelines and one expert opinion-based standard for home care were retrieved. Of these guidelines, two were exclusively devoted to HPN. Although the guidelines generally covered the same topics, most did not provide information on intravenous medication, bone metabolic disease, and indications in patients with malignant disease. Moreover, we found grading discrepancies among various guidelines, as identical recommendations were often labeled with different grades. Conclusion: Our comparison of guidelines and standards for HPN revealed substantial differences among recommendations. Identification of these discrepancies and omissions should facilitate the development of more comprehensive and better justified guidelines in the future. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 608
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies [J].
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Irfan, Affan ;
Sola, Ivan ;
Gich, Ignasi ;
Delgado-Noguera, Mario ;
Rigau, David ;
Tort, Sera ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Burgers, Jako ;
Schunemann, Holger .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06) :e58
[2]  
American Society For Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Board of Directors, 2008, JPEN J PARENTER ENTE, V33, P255
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NUTR SUPP AD OR NUTR
[4]  
ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force, 2002, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, V26, p1SA
[5]  
Belgian Branch of the Cochrane Collaboration, CEBAM GUID INT NETW
[6]   ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: Non-surgical oncology [J].
Bozzetti, F. ;
Arends, J. ;
Lundholm, K. ;
Micklewright, A. ;
Zurcher, G. ;
Muscaritoli, M. .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 28 (04) :445-454
[7]   The ESPEN clinical practice guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: Present status and perspectives for future research [J].
Bozzetti, Federico ;
Forbes, Alastair .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 28 (04) :359-364
[8]   Metabolic bone disease associated with total parenteral nutrition [J].
Buchman, AL ;
Moukarzel, A .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2000, 19 (04) :217-231
[9]  
Charney Pamela J, 2004, Nutr Clin Pract, V19, P416
[10]  
Cluzeau F, 2003, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V12, P18