Modern Robust Statistical Methods An Easy Way to Maximize the Accuracy and Power of Your Research

被引:708
作者
Erceg-Hurn, David M. [1 ]
Mirosevich, Vikki M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
robust statistics; nonparametric statistics; effect size; significance testing; software;
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 [教育学]; 0402 [心理学];
摘要
Classic parametric statistical significance tests, such as analysis of variance and least squares regression, are widely used by researchers in many disciplines, including psychology. For classic parametric tests to produce accurate results, the assumptions underlying them (e.g., normality and homoscedasticity) must be satisfied. These assumptions are rarely met when analyzing real data. The use of classic parametric methods with violated assumptions can result in the inaccurate computation of p values, effect sizes, and confidence intervals. This may lead to substantive errors in the interpretation of data. Many modem robust statistical methods alleviate the problems inherent in using parametric methods with violated assumptions, yet modem methods are rarely used by researchers. The authors examine why this is the case, arguing that most researchers are unaware of the serious limitations of classic methods and are unfamiliar with modern alternatives. A range of modern robust and rank-based significance tests suitable for analyzing a wide range of designs is introduced. Practical advice on conducting modern analyses using software such as SPSS, SAS, and R is provided. The authors conclude by discussing robust effect size indices.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 601
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]
Abebe A, 2001, DRUG INF J, V35, P947, DOI 10.1177/009286150103500334
[2]
Probabilistic index: an intuitive non-parametric approach to measuring the size of treatment effects [J].
Acion, L ;
Peterson, JJ ;
Temple, S ;
Arndt, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (04) :591-602
[3]
Nonparametric hypotheses and rank statistics for unbalanced factorial designs [J].
Akritas, MG ;
Arnold, SF ;
Brunner, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 92 (437) :258-265
[4]
Effect sizes and their intervals: The two-level repeated measures case [J].
Algina, J ;
Keselman, HJ ;
Penfield, RD .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 65 (02) :241-258
[5]
An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: A robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case [J].
Algina, J ;
Keselman, HJ ;
Penfield, RD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 10 (03) :317-328
[6]
Algina J, 2006, J MOD APPL STAT METH, V5, P2
[7]
Confidence interval coverage for Cohen's effect size statistic [J].
Algina, James ;
Keselman, H. J. ;
Penfield, Randall D. .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 66 (06) :945-960
[8]
[Anonymous], ANN M SE SAS US GROU
[9]
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[10]
THE EFFECTS OF VIOLATIONS OF ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING THE T-TEST [J].
BONEAU, CA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1960, 57 (01) :49-64