Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle

被引:94
作者
Song, J
Chappell, JC
Qi, M
VanGieson, EJ
Kaul, S
Price, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Biomed Engn, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Cardiovasc Div, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01793-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES Our objective was to test the hypothesis that the ultrasound pulsing interval (11), microbubble injection site and microvascular pressure significantly influence the transport of 100-nm microspheres to muscle through extravasation sites created by, the destruction of microbubbles with ultrasound. BACKGROUND Microbubbles show promise as targeted drug and gene delivery agents; however, designing optimal microbubble-based therapies will require an understanding of the factors that influence the transport of microbubble-delivered, gene-bearing vehicles to tissue. METHODS Ultrasound at 1 MHz, with a peak negative pressure amplitude of 0.75 MPa, was applied to microbubbles and 100-nm microspheres in exteriorized rat spinotrapezius muscle, Ultrasound PIs of 1, 3, 5 and 10 s, arterial microsphere injection times of 10 or 40 s and arterial versus venous injection sites were tested. RESULTS Extravasation point creation and microsphere delivery were greatest when the ultrasound PI was 5 or 10 s. No significant differences in extravasation point creation or microsphere delivery were observed with arterial versus venous microbubble injection, but a trend toward increased microsphere delivery with arterial injection may exist. Decreasing the arterial injection time from 40 to 10 s increased microvascular pressure, which, in turn, substantially enhanced microsphere transport to tissue, without a concomitant increase in the number of extravasation points. CONCLUSIONS The ultrasound PI and microvascular pressure significantly influence the creation of extravasation points and the transport of microspheres to tissue. These factors may be important in designing and optimizing contrast ultrasound-based therapies. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 731
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
CHEN D, 1994, BIORHEOLOGY, V31, P103
[2]  
CHRISTIANSEN JP, 2001, J AM SOC ECHOCARDIOG, V14, P426
[3]   INTERSTITIAL FLUID PRESSURE .3. ITS EFFECT ON RESISTANCE TO TISSUE FLUID MOBILITY [J].
GUYTON, AC ;
SCHEEL, K ;
MURPHREE, D .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1966, 19 (02) :412-&
[4]  
INTAGLIETTA M, 1970, Microvascular Research, V2, P212, DOI 10.1016/0026-2862(70)90009-9
[5]   Spontaneous redistribution after reperfusion - A unique property of AIP 201, an ultrasound contrast agent [J].
Linka, AZ ;
Skyba, DM ;
Price, RJ ;
Wei, K ;
Skalak, TC ;
Kaul, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (06) :1765-1772
[6]   Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 mhz ultrasound on mouse intestine [J].
Miller, DL ;
Gies, RA .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 24 (08) :1201-1208
[7]   The influence of ultrasound frequency and gas-body composition on the contrast agent-mediated enhancement of vascular bioeffects in mouse intestine [J].
Miller, DL ;
Gies, RA .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 26 (02) :307-313
[8]   Diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies induces capillary rupture in mice [J].
Miller, DL ;
Quddus, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (18) :10179-10184
[9]   Ten-fold augmentation of endothelial uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor with ultrasound after systemic administration [J].
Mukherjee, D ;
Wong, J ;
Griffin, B ;
Ellis, SG ;
Porter, T ;
Sen, S ;
Thomas, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (06) :1678-1686
[10]  
Porter TR, 1996, J ULTRAS MED, V15, P577