Prioritizing global conservation efforts

被引:453
作者
Wilson, KA [1 ]
McBride, MF
Bode, M
Possingham, HP
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Ecol, Sch Integrat Biol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Ecol, Sch Phys Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature04366
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One of the most pressing issues facing the global conservation community is how to distribute limited resources between regions identified as priorities for biodiversity conservation(1-3). Approaches such as biodiversity hotspots(4), endemic bird areas(5) and ecoregions(6) are used by international organizations to prioritize conservation efforts globally(7). Although identifying priority regions is an important first step in solving this problem, it does not indicate how limited resources should be allocated between regions. Here we formulate how to allocate optimally conservation resources between regions identified as priorities for conservation - the 'conservation resource allocation problem'. Stochastic dynamic programming is used to find the optimal schedule of resource allocation for small problems but is intractable for large problems owing to the " curse of dimensionality"(8). We identify two easy- to- use and easy- to- interpret heuristics that closely approximate the optimal solution. We also show the importance of both correctly formulating the problem and using information on how investment returns change through time. Our conservation resource allocation approach can be applied at any spatial scale. We demonstrate the approach with an example of optimal resource allocation among five priority regions in Wallacea and Sundaland, the transition zone between Asia and Australasia.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 340
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests [J].
Achard, F ;
Eva, HD ;
Stibig, HJ ;
Mayaux, P ;
Gallego, J ;
Richards, T ;
Malingreau, JP .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) :999-1002
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BirdLife Conservation Series
[3]   Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gaston, KJ ;
Blyth, S ;
James, A ;
Kapos, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) :1046-1050
[4]  
BALMFORD A, 2000, CONSERV BIOL, V14, P1
[5]  
Bellman R., 1957, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
[6]   Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity [J].
Brooks, TM ;
Mittermeier, RA ;
Mittermeier, CG ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Rylands, AB ;
Konstant, WR ;
Flick, P ;
Pilgrim, J ;
Oldfield, S ;
Magin, G ;
Hilton-Taylor, C .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) :909-923
[7]  
Clark C. W., 2000, OX ECOL EV
[8]   Dynamic reserve site selection [J].
Costello, C ;
Polasky, S .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :157-174
[9]   Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo [J].
Curran, LM ;
Trigg, SN ;
McDonald, AK ;
Astiani, D ;
Hardiono, YM ;
Siregar, P ;
Caniago, I ;
Kasischke, E .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5660) :1000-1003
[10]   US and Vietnam plan joint dioxin research [J].
Dalton, R .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6798) :818-818