The effect of grain size of rock phosphate amendment on metal immobilization in contaminated soils

被引:85
作者
Chen, S. B.
Zhu, Y. G.
Ma, Y. B.
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
heavy metals; immobilization; rock phosphate; grain size;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When rock phosphates (RP) are used to remediate Pb-contaminated soils, their effectiveness is likely affected by their grain size. In this study, the effect of grain size of rock phosphate on the effectiveness of heavy metal immobilization in two contaminated soils was measured in pot experiment. Rock phosphate was used with four different grain sizes: < 35, 35-72, 72-133 and 133-266 mu m. The application rate of rock phosphate in two soils was determined based on P/metals (Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd) molar ratio of 5.0 in the soils. The results showed that rock phosphate of the smallest grain size (< 35 mu m) was superior to all of other grain sizes more than 35 mu m for reducing uptake in plant (Brassica oleracea L.) shoots for Cd (19.6-50.0%), Pb (21.9-51.4%) and Zn (22.4-34.6%), respectively, as compared with the soil without application of rock phosphate. Sequential extraction analysis indicated that rock phosphate was most effective for soil Pb to induced transformation from non-residual fractions to a residual fraction than that for Zn and Cd. Such transformation was probably through dissolution of Pb associated with exchangeable (EX), organic fraction (OC), acidic fraction (AC) and amorphous Fe and Al oxides-bound (OX) fraction and precipitation of pyromorphite-like minerals. Results suggested that the rock phosphate with small grain size was superior to that with large grain size for in situ remediation technology. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 79
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ADAMU C A, 1989, Tobacco Science, V33, P96
[2]  
[Anonymous], TOB SCI
[3]  
Basta N, 2000, J SOIL CONTAM, V9, P149, DOI 10.1080/10588330008984181
[4]   Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing heavy metal transport in a smelter-contaminated soil [J].
Basta, NT ;
McGowen, SL .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2004, 127 (01) :73-82
[5]   Mechanisms of lead, copper, and zinc retention by phosphate rock [J].
Cao, XD ;
Ma, LQ ;
Rhue, DR ;
Appel, CS .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2004, 131 (03) :435-444
[6]   In-situ immobilization of cadmium and lead by different amendments in two contaminated soils [J].
Cheng, SF ;
Hseu, ZY .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2002, 140 (1-4) :73-84
[7]   Mimicked in-situ stabilization of metals in a cropped soil: Bioavailability and chemical form of zinc [J].
Chlopecka, A ;
Adriano, DC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (11) :3294-3303
[8]  
*COMM QUAL STAND C, 1994, COLL NAT QUAL STAND, P80
[9]   Remediation of contaminated land by formation of heavy metal phosphates [J].
CotterHowells, J ;
Caporn, S .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 11 (1-2) :335-342
[10]   CONTENT AND FRACTIONATION OF HEAVY-METALS IN WATER-TREATMENT SLUDGES [J].
ELLIOTT, HA ;
DEMPSEY, BA ;
MAILLE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1990, 19 (02) :330-334