Intraperitoneal α-interferon alternating with cisplatin in residual ovarian carcinoma:: A phase II Gynecologic Oncology Group study

被引:24
作者
Berek, JS [1 ]
Markman, M
Blessing, JA
Kucera, PR
Nelson, BE
Anderson, B
Hanjani, P
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Div Gynecol Oncol, Sch Med, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland Clin Canc Ctr, Dept Med Hematol Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Grp, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Div Gynecol Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[7] Abington Mem Hosp, Gynecol Oncol Sect, Abington, PA 19001 USA
[8] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19001 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1999.5455
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this study was to study the combination of intraperitoneal alpha-interferon and cisplatin administered second-line in an alternating sequence in small volume residual epithelial ovarian cancer after second-look surgery and the activity of this combination based on prior response to first-line platinum compounds. Methods. Sixty-two patients with minimal residual(<0.5 cm) epithelial ovarian cancer at reassessment laparotomy were entered into a multicenter trial of intraperitoneal alpha-interferon alternating with cisplatin given for eight cycles unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The patients were considered favorable if they were platinum-sensitive and/or relapsed 6 months or longer after completing treatment. Another reassessment laparotomy was performed within 12 weeks of completion of treatment in patients who were in clinical remission. Results. Fifty-four patients were clinically evaluable and 18 were surgically reassessed, 5 of whom had a negative reassessment operation (20% complete response and 8% partial response). Of the 54 patients evaluable for toxicity, the most common adverse effects of more than grade 2 were gastrointestinal in 13 (47%), neutropenia in 9 (17%), and leukopenia in 6 (12%), Grade 4 toxicity was seen in 10 instances: 4 gastrointestinal, 2 neutropenia, 2 thrombocytopenia, 1 wound infection, and 1 allergic reaction. Conclusions, cu-Interferon and cisplatin are active agents in favorable patients with minimal residual epithelial ovarian cancer at second-look. The combination of the two drugs administered in an alternating sequence appears to be associated with more side effects than when either drug is administered alone. The combination produced response rates similar to those seen when either drug is given alone. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Liu, PY ;
Hannigan, EV ;
OToole, R ;
Williams, SD ;
Young, JA ;
Franklin, EW ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Malviya, VK ;
DuBeshter, B ;
Adelson, MD ;
Hoskins, WJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) :1950-1955
[2]  
BEREK JS, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P4447
[3]   INTRAPERITONEAL IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR OVARIAN-CANCER WITH ALPHA-INTERFERON [J].
BEREK, JS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (4-5) :719-721
[4]  
BEREK JS, 1991, GYNECOL ONCOL, V40, P237
[5]  
BEREK JS, 1994, PRACTICAL GYNECOLOGI, P340
[6]  
BEREK JS, 1990, J CLIN ONCOL, V10, P1610
[7]   TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT ASCITES DUE TO RECURRENT REFRACTORY OVARIAN-CANCER - THE USE OF INTERFERON-ALPHA OR INTERFERON-ALPHA PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY INVIVO AND INVITRO [J].
BEZWODA, WR ;
GOLOMBICK, T ;
DANSEY, R ;
KEEPING, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 27 (11) :1423-1429
[8]  
BLESSING JA, 1990, CHEMOTHERAPY GYNECOL, P63
[9]  
DEDRICK RL, 1978, CANCER TREAT REP, V62, P1
[10]   HUMAN-LEUKOCYTE INTERFERON THERAPY FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
EINHORN, N ;
CANTELL, K ;
EINHORN, S ;
STRANDER, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1982, 5 (02) :167-172