Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users

被引:83
作者
Galvin, JJ [1 ]
Fu, QJ [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Dept Auditory Implants & Percept, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
来源
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2005年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
modulation detection threshold; stimulation rate; stimulation mode; stimulation level; temporal cues;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-005-0007-6
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In cochlear implant (CI) patients, temporal processing is often poorest at low listening levels, making perception difficult for low-amplitude temporal cues that are important for consonant recognition and/or speech perception in noise. It remains unclear how speech processor parameters such as stimulation rate and stimulation mode may affect temporal processing, especially at low listening levels. The present study investigated the effects of these parameters on modulation detection by six CI users. Modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) were measured as functions of stimulation rate, mode, and level. Results show that for all stimulation rate and mode conditions, modulation sensitivity was poorest at quiet listening levels, consistent with results from previous studies. MDTs were better with the lower stimulation rate, especially for quiet-to-medium listening levels. Stimulation mode had no significant effect on MDTs. These results suggest that, although high stimulation rates may better encode temporal information and widen the electrode dynamic range, CI patients may not be able to access these enhanced temporal cues, especially at the lower portions of the dynamic range. Lower stimulation rates may provide better recognition of weak acoustic envelope information.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 279
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
BACON SP, 1985, AUDIOLOGY, V24, P117
[2]   FACTORS PREDICTING POSTOPERATIVE SENTENCE SCORES IN POSTLINGUISTICALLY DEAF ADULT COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS [J].
BLAMEY, PJ ;
PYMAN, BC ;
CLARK, GM ;
DOWELL, RC ;
GORDON, M ;
BROWN, AM ;
HOLLOW, RD .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1992, 101 (04) :342-348
[3]  
Brill SM, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, pS104
[4]  
BRILL SM, 1998, 4 EUR S PAED COCHL I
[5]  
BRILL SM, 1998, 24 INT C AUD BUEN AI
[6]   PLAYED-AGAIN SAM - FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE PITCH OF AMPLITUDE-MODULATED NOISE [J].
BURNS, EM ;
VIEMEISTER, NF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 70 (06) :1655-1660
[7]   LOW-PASS FILTERING IN AMPLITUDE-MODULATION DETECTION ASSOCIATED WITH VOWEL AND CONSONANT IDENTIFICATION IN SUBJECTS WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS [J].
CAZALS, Y ;
PELIZZONE, M ;
SAUDAN, O ;
BOEX, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 96 (04) :2048-2054
[8]   INDICATION OF A RELATION BETWEEN SPEECH-PERCEPTION AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTION FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTEES [J].
CAZALS, Y ;
KASPER, A ;
PELIZZONE, M ;
MONTANDON, P .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1991, 100 (11) :893-895
[9]   Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components [J].
Chatterjee, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (04) :2042-2053
[10]  
CHATTERJEE M, 2005, JARO-J ASSOC RES OTO, V5, P360