Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a large single centre's experience

被引:16
作者
Farrell, RJ [1 ]
Mahmud, N [1 ]
Noonan, N [1 ]
Kelleher, D [1 ]
Keeling, PWN [1 ]
机构
[1] Trinity Coll Dublin, St James Hosp, Dept Med & Gastroenterol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03173884
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Most large published series on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are multicentre-based and consequently reflect varying experience. Aims To assess morbidity and mortality rates of ERCP in a single tertiary referral centre, Methods A series of 1,758 consecutive ERCPs performed in 1,148 patients between 1991 and 1994 were reviewed to evaluate indications, findings, procedures, success, complication and mortality rates, Results There were 1,108 (63%) successful initial ERCPs, 11 % failed cannulation attempts and 26% follow-up ERCPs. The desired duct was successfully cannulated in 96.5% of cases, Initial cannulation failure rate was 8.8%. Twenty-seven per cent had normal ERCPs, 30% had choledocholithiasis and 22% had strictures, Fifty-five per cent had therapeutic ERCPs. Major complications occurred in 3.5% with four ERCP-related deaths (0.35%). Therapeutic ERCP had a higher incidence of major complications compared to diagnostic ERCP: 4.6% vs 2.1 %, (p=0.02); and mortality rate was 0.5% vs 0.2%, (p=0.4). Significant haemorrhage secondary to biliary sphincterotomy, pre-cut papillotomy and snare papillectomy accounted for most of the difference (1.6%). Conclusions The majority of ERCPs were performed in elderly patients, over half of whom required therapeutic ERCP. Therapeutic ERCP carried significantly higher complication rate compared with diagnostic ERCP. Unsuccessful cannulation and follow-up ERCP accounted for 11 % and 26% of ERCP workload, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 180
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [J].
Bearcroft, PW ;
Lomas, DJ .
GUT, 1997, 41 (02) :135-137
[2]
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [J].
Bret, PM ;
Reinhold, C .
ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 29 (06) :472-486
[3]
CHEN YK, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P327
[4]
ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[5]
EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi [J].
Cuschieri, A ;
Lezoche, E ;
Morino, M ;
Croce, E ;
Lacy, A ;
Toouli, J ;
Faggioni, A ;
Ribeiro, VM ;
Jakimowicz, J ;
Visa, J ;
Hanna, GB .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (10) :952-957
[6]
RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENTS VERSUS POLYETHYLENE STENTS FOR DISTAL MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION [J].
DAVIDS, PHP ;
GROEN, AK ;
RAUWS, EAJ ;
TYTGAT, GNJ ;
HUIBREGTSE, K .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8834-5) :1488-1492
[7]
Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related? [J].
Deans, GT ;
Sedman, P ;
Martin, DF ;
Royston, CMS ;
Leow, CK ;
Thomas, WEG ;
Brough, WA .
GUT, 1997, 41 (04) :545-548
[8]
Devereaux C E, 2000, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V10, P117
[9]
NEEDLE KNIFE PAPILLOTOMY - HOW SAFE AND HOW EFFECTIVE [J].
DOWSETT, JF ;
POLYDOROU, AA ;
VAIRA, D ;
DANNA, LM ;
ASHRAF, M ;
CROKER, J ;
SALMON, PR ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
HATFIELD, ARW .
GUT, 1990, 31 (08) :905-908
[10]
Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain [J].
Farrell, RJ ;
Noonan, N ;
Mahmud, N ;
Morrin, MM ;
Kelleher, D ;
Keeling, PWN .
ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 33 (08) :668-675