Rationality and external reference

被引:6
作者
Gaertner, W [1 ]
Xu, YS
机构
[1] Univ Osnabruck, Dept Econ, D-49069 Osnabruck, Germany
[2] Univ Nottingham, Dept Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
rationality; choice; choice functions; external references; norms;
D O I
10.1177/104346399011002003
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article is about rationality conditions underlying individual choice and questions the universal applicability of the 'standard conditions'. It is argued that when making choices and decisions, an individual appeals to external references. As a consequence, the issue of rationality can be sensibly analyzed only if external references are spelled out. Utility maximization, menus, private and social norms are some of the examples of external references. In important cases, utility maximization of the standard form is not adequate for explaining individual rationality. Two such cases are analyzed and axiomatically characterized: the choice of the second largest element and the choice of the median. In both situations, the external references are norms. The characterizing axioms in each case are compared to the standard axioms of rational choice theory.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 185
页数:17
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Arrow K., 1971, Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, P3
[2]   RATIONAL CHOICE FUNCTIONS AND ORDERINGS [J].
ARROW, KJ .
ECONOMICA, 1959, 26 (102) :121-127
[3]   Never choose the uniquely largest - A characterization [J].
Baigent, N ;
Gaertner, W .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 8 (02) :239-249
[4]  
BINMORE K, 1994, J INST THEOR ECON, V150, P45
[5]   SOCIAL NORMS AND ECONOMIC-THEORY [J].
ELSTER, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1989, 3 (04) :99-117
[6]  
FRANK RH, 1987, AM ECON REV, V77, P593
[7]  
Fukuyama F., 1995, TRUST, DOI DOI 10.2202/1944-4079.1092
[8]  
GAERTNER W, 1999, IN PRESS SOCIAL CHOI
[9]  
Heap SH, 1992, THEORY CHOICE CRITIC
[10]  
KATZNER D, 1997, UNPUB CULTURE EXPLAN