Birth weight as a predictor of breast cancer: a case-control study in Norway

被引:68
作者
Vatten, LJ [1 ]
Maehle, BO
Nilsen, TIL
Tretli, S
Hsieh, CC
trichopoulos, D
Stuver, SO
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Community Med & Gen Practice, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Pathol, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[3] Canc Registry Norway, Oslo, Norway
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Canc Prevent, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Ctr Canc, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
关键词
breast cancer; birth weight; birth length; placenta weight;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6600011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The hypothesis that birth weight is positively associated with adult risk of breast cancer implies that factors related to intrauterine growth may be important for the development of this malignancy. Using stored birth records from the two main hospitals in Trondheim and Bergen, Norway, we collected information on birth weight, birth length and placenta weight among 373 women who developed breast cancer. From the same archives, we selected as controls 1150 women of identical age as the cases without a history of breast cancer. Information on age at first birth and parity were collected from the Central Person Registry in Norway. Based on conditional logistic regression analysis, breast cancer risk was positively associated with birth weight and with birth length (P for trend=0.02). Birth weights in the highest quartile (3730 g or more) were associated with 40% higher risk (odds ratio, 1.4, 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.9) of breast cancer compared to birth weights in the lowest quartile (less than 3090 g). For birth length, the odds ratio for women who were 51.5 cm or more (highest quartile) was 1.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8) compared to being less than 50 cm (lowest quartile) at birth. Adjustment for age at first birth and parity did not change these estimates. Placenta weight was not associated with breast cancer risk. This study provides strong evidence that intrauterine factors may influence future risk of breast cancer. A common feature of such factors would be their ability to stimulate foetal growth and, simultaneously, to influence intrauterine development of the mammary gland.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 91
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] PRENATAL FACTORS MAY INFLUENCE PREDISPOSITION TO BREAST-CANCER
    ANBAZHAGAN, R
    GUSTERSON, BA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (01) : 1 - 3
  • [2] Birthweight, childhood growth and risk of breast cancer in a British cohort
    De Stavola, BL
    Hardy, R
    Kuh, D
    Silva, ID
    Wadsworth, M
    Swerdlow, AJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (07) : 964 - 968
  • [3] PERINATAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ADULT MAMMOGRAPHIC PATTERNS
    EKBOM, A
    THURFJELL, E
    HSIEH, CC
    TRICHOPOULOS, D
    ADAMI, HO
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 61 (02) : 177 - 180
  • [4] Intrauterine environment and breast cancer risk in women: A population-based study
    Ekbom, A
    Hsieh, CC
    Lipworth, L
    Adami, HO
    Trichopoulos, D
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (01): : 71 - 76
  • [5] EVIDENCE OF PRENATAL INFLUENCES ON BREAST-CANCER RISK
    EKBOM, A
    TRICHOPOULOS, D
    ADAMI, HO
    HSIEH, CC
    LAN, SJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1992, 340 (8826) : 1015 - 1018
  • [6] Weights of placentae from small-for-gestational age infants revisited
    Heinonen, S
    Taipale, P
    Saarikoski, S
    [J]. PLACENTA, 2001, 22 (05) : 399 - 404
  • [7] Hübinette A, 2001, INT J CANCER, V91, P248, DOI 10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::AID-IJC1025>3.3.CO
  • [8] 2-H
  • [9] Birth characteristics and subsequent risk for breast cancer in very young women
    Innes, K
    Byers, T
    Schymura, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 152 (12) : 1121 - 1128
  • [10] In utero exposures and breast cancer:: a study of opposite-sexed twins
    Kaijser, M
    Lichtenstein, P
    Granath, F
    Erlandsson, G
    Cnattingius, S
    Ekbom, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (01) : 60 - 62