Regional calibration of Hargreaves equation for estimating reference ET in a semiarid environment

被引:229
作者
Gavilán, P [1 ]
Lorite, IJ [1 ]
Tornero, S [1 ]
Berengena, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest & Formac Agraria Alameda Obispo, IFAPA, Area Prod Ecol & Recursos Nat, Cordoba 14004, Spain
关键词
calibration; evapotranspiration models; Hargreaves; reference evapotranspiration; semiarid environment;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2005.05.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Hargreaves equation provides reference evapotranspiration (ET.) estimates when only air temperature data are available, although it requires previous local calibration for acceptable performance. This equation has been evaluated under semiarid conditions in Southern Spain using data from 86 meteorological stations, comparing daily estimates against those from the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith equation, which was used as standard. Variability of results among location was clearly apparent, with MBE ranging from 0.74 to -1.13 mm d(-1) and RMSE from 0.46 to 1.65 mm d(-1). Maxima under- and overestimation amounted to 24.5 and 22.5%, respectively. In general, larger under- and overestimations occurred in stations located close to the coast and at inland areas, respectively. Yearly means of windspeed (V) and daily temperature range (Delta 7) fairly influenced the accuracy of the equation. It was more accurate for windy locations with large Delta T, and for locations with light wind conditions combined with low to moderate values of Delta T According to the values taken by V and Delta T, the stations were represented by points on the Delta T-V coordinate plane, in which four regions were delimited. A regional calibration was carried out considering only temperature and wind conditions. Correction was not necessary for stations located within two of them; for the other two regions, new values for the empirical coefficient of the equation are suggested (0.0027 and 0.002 1). After correction, average RMSE and maximum and minimum MBE decreased substantially (12, 24 and 41%, respectively), and 74 out of the 86 locations gave quite accurate results, with relative values of MBE lower than 10% in most cases. Alternatively, another method based on kriging interpolation was proposed to obtain, for each individual station, locally adjusted values for the empirical coefficient as a function of the same variables. This second correction procedure behaved even better than the first one. There was a 15% improvement in the average RMSE, and maximum and minimum MBE values decreased 50 and 70%, respectively. At all locations, relative values of MBE were less than 10% and in 70% of them were lower than 5%. Validation was done by using data from 14 meteorological stations for other Spanish regions, and the consequences from the application of the corrections proposed for an irrigation district are discussed. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 281
页数:25
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Allen R., 1995, Evaluation procedures for estimating grass reference evapotranspiration using air temperature data only, V2, P56
[2]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[3]   A PENMAN FOR ALL SEASONS [J].
ALLEN, RG .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1986, 112 (04) :348-368
[4]   Assessing integrity of weather data for reference evapotranspiration estimation [J].
Allen, RG .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (02) :97-106
[5]  
ALLEN RG, 1993, UNPUB EVALUATION TEM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Report of the expert consultation on procedures for revision of FAO Guidelines for prediction of crop water evapotranspiration. report of the expert consultation on procedures for revision of FAO Guidelines for prediction of crop water requirements
[7]   Reference evapotranspiration estimation in a highly advective semiarid environment [J].
Berengena, J ;
Gavilán, P .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (02) :147-163
[8]   Estimation methods for crop water requirements in the Gediz Basin of western Turkey [J].
Beyazgül, M ;
Kayam, Y ;
Engelsman, F .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 229 (1-2) :19-26
[9]  
COROMINAS J, 2002, 3 C IB GEST PLAN AG
[10]  
DEHARO JM, 2003, P 3 INT C EXP AUT WE