Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery

被引:148
作者
Nelson, Richard L. [1 ]
Glenny, Anne Marie [2 ]
Song, Fujian [3 ]
机构
[1] No Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, MANDEC, Cochrane Oral Hlth Grp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ E Anglia, Sch Med Hlth Policy & Practice Allied Hlth Profes, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 01期
关键词
SYSTEMIC ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; CEFUROXIME PLUS METRONIDAZOLE; AMOXICILLIN-CLAVULANIC ACID; MULTIPLE-DOSE CEFOXITIN; COLO-RECTAL SURGERY; MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION; SINGLE-AGENT PROPHYLAXIS; SHORT-TERM PROPHYLAXIS; PREPAID GROUP-PRACTICE; WOUND-INFECTION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Research shows that administration of prophylactic antibiotics before colorectal surgery prevents postoperative surgical wound infection (SWI). The best antibiotic choice, timing of administration and route of administration remain undetermined. Objectives To establish the effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of SWI in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: specifically to determine, 1 Whether it reduces risk of SWI. 2 The target spectrum/a of bacteria (aerobic and/or anaerobic). 3 The best timing and duration of antibiotic administration. 4 The most effective route of antibiotic administration (intravenous, oral or both). 5 Whether any antibiotic is clearly more effective than the currently recommended gold standard. Search strategy CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, were searched from January, 1980 to December, 2007. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials of prophylactic antibiotic use in elective and emergency colorectal surgery, with SWI as an outcome. Data collection and analysis Data were abstracted and reviewed by three authors for only the single, dichotomous outcome of SWI. Main results The review included 182 trials (30,880 participants), and 50 different antibiotics, including 17 cephalosporins. Many studies had multiple variables that separated the two study groups and could not be compared to other studies that tested one antibiotic and had a single variable separating the two groups. Meta-analyses demonstrated a statistically significant difference in postoperative SWI when prophylactic antibiotics were compared to placebo/no treatment (relative risk (RR) 0.30, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.22 to 0.41). No statistically significant differences were shown when comparing short- and long-term duration of prophylaxis (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.27); or single dose versus multiple dose antibiotics (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.05). Additional aerobic coverage and additional anaerobic coverage both showed statistically significant improvements in SWI rates (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.71 and RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.85, respectively); as did combined oral and intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis when compared to intravenous alone (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.74), or oral alone (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.87). Established gold standard regimens were no less effective than any other antibiotic choice. Authors' conclusions Antibiotics covering aerobic and aerobic bacteria should be delivered orally and intravenously prior to colorectal surgery. Antibiotics delivered within this framework will reduce the risk of postoperative SWI by at least 75%. Further research is required to establish the optimal timing and duration of dosing, and frequency of longer-term adverse effects such as Clostridium difficile pseudomembranous colitis.
引用
收藏
页数:148
相关论文
共 203 条
[1]   SINGLE VERSUS TRIPLE DOSE ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL-SURGERY AND THE IMPACT ON BACTERIAL ECOLOGY [J].
ABERG, C ;
THORE, M .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1991, 18 (02) :149-154
[2]  
ABERG C, 1984, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V150, P79
[3]   PARENTERAL ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS OR ORAL ANTI-MICROBIAL BOWEL PREPARATION FOR COLORECTAL SURGERY [J].
AEBERHARD, P ;
FLUCKIGER, M ;
BERGER, J ;
NOVAK, A .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1981, 353 (04) :233-240
[4]   COMPARISON OF PROPHYLACTIC AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM WITH GENTAMICIN AND METRONIDAZOLE IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
AHCHONG, K ;
YIP, AWC ;
LEE, FCW ;
CHIU, KM .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1994, 27 (02) :149-154
[5]  
AMMANN J, 1981, HELV CHIR ACTA, V48, P235
[6]  
ANDAKER L, 1992, EUR J SURG, V158, P181
[7]  
ANDERS VA, 1984, ZENTRALBLATT CHIRURG, V109, P1097
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIS COLON RECTUM, V30, P786
[9]  
ANTONELLI W, 1985, ITALIAN J SURG SCI, V15, P225
[10]  
ARMENGAUD F, 1986, PRESSE MED, V15, P2351