Reputation for technological innovation: Does it actually cohere with innovative activity?

被引:68
作者
Hoeflinger, Patrick J. [1 ]
Nagel, Christian [2 ]
Sandner, Philipp [3 ]
机构
[1] TUM, TUM Sch Management, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Passau, Chair Mkt & Innovat, Passau, Germany
[3] Frankfurt Sch Finance & Management, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE | 2018年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Technological innovation; Innovative performance; Reputation; Patents; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; PRODUCT INNOVATION; MARKET VALUE; STRATEGIC RESOURCE; BRAND EQUITY; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; PATENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jik.2017.08.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Firms strategically promote, foster and pursue a reputation for technological innovation. Yet, present research did not examine whether such perception actually coheres with innovative activity itself. Previous studies in this field often relied solely on tangible products/product introductions, hence we apply multiple proxies based on a firm's intangible innovative performance to examine the influences on reputation for technological innovation. Using patent, financial and consumer data our Poisson regression analyzes 65 international firms which have been nominated by 231 consumers. We apply time-series and likewise cross-sectional data for our interdisciplinary analysis. Our findings demonstrate that innovative performance (citation intensity) is linked to reputation for technological innovation. Counter-intuitively, our results provide evidence that marketing intensity negatively influences a reputation for wtechnological innovation. From the results, we conclude that innovative performance may be associated with a reputation for technological innovation. Actual technological advancement attracts attention from consumersthat cannot be purchased with greater marketing investments. This implies that consumers appreciate the costly and uncertain R&D efforts and value those firms that constantly offer innovation. As a theoretical implication, the consideration of intangible inputs for reputation research is an important contribution for a holistic understanding. The results represent essential strategic information for innovation and marketing functions, where both divisions need to align their activities and investments. (C) 2017 Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [1] Brand, organisational identity and reputation in SMEs: an overview
    Abimbola, Temi
    Vallaster, Christine
    [J]. QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2007, 10 (04): : 341 - +
  • [2] Innovation assessment through patent analysis
    Abraham, BP
    Moitra, SD
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2001, 21 (04) : 245 - 252
  • [3] ACS ZJ, 1989, KYKLOS, V42, P171
  • [4] Agarwal ManojK., 1996, MARKET LETT, V7, P237, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00435740
  • [5] Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study
    Ahuja, G
    Katila, R
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) : 197 - 220
  • [6] MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM
    AKERLOF, GA
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) : 488 - 500
  • [7] ALI A, 1995, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V12, P54, DOI 10.1016/0737-6782(94)00027-D
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2007, NBERWork. Pap. 13473
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1994, FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES S