Recursive combination tests

被引:162
作者
Brannath, W [1 ]
Posch, M [1 ]
Bauer, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Med Stat, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
adaptive multistage procedure; combination test; confidence interval; group sequential test; group sequential trial; p value;
D O I
10.1198/016214502753479374
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We present a method that extends the flexibility of adaptive designs to the number of interim analyses and to the choice of decision boundaries. At each stage of the trial, the design of the next stage can be determined using all of the information gathered so far. Additionally, one can specify the next stage as the final stage or can plan a further interim analysis. The method is based on a recursive application of the two-stage combination tests for p values. The crucial point is the appropriate definition of a p value function that combines p values from two separate stages to a single p value. Formally, we start with a two-stage combination test. However, the p value of the second stage can be replaced by the p value of a further combination test. This applies if the experimenter decides in the first interim analysis to per-form another interim analysis, thereby extending the design to at least three stages. Obviously, this can be also done in a recursive way in the following interim analyses. The test decision is based on an overall p value, which can be easily calculated by concatenation of the p value functions for the combination tests used. Under very general conditions, this procedure controls the level alpha. Recursive combination tests cover the classical group sequential and adaptive two-stage tests as special cases. By construction, they also allow for simple computation of confidence intervals and median unbiased point estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 244
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ARMITAGE P, 1958, BIOMETRIKA, V45, P1
[2]   On the power of Fisher's combination test for two stage sampling in the presence of nuisance parameters [J].
Banik, N ;
Kohne, K ;
Bauer, P .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 38 (01) :25-37
[3]  
Bauer P, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1833, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990730)18:14<1833::AID-SIM221>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-V
[5]   AN ADAPTIVE METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING A DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP [J].
BAUER, P ;
ROHMEL, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (14) :1595-1607
[6]  
BAUER P, 1986, BIOMETRIKA, V73, P759
[7]   EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTS WITH ADAPTIVE INTERIM ANALYSES [J].
BAUER, P ;
KOHNE, K .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1029-1041
[8]  
Bauer P., 1989, BIOMETRIE INFORMATIK, V20, P130
[9]   Modification of sample size in group sequential clinical trials [J].
Cui, L ;
Hung, HMJ ;
Wang, SJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (03) :853-857
[10]  
Fisher LD, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1551, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980730)17:14<1551::AID-SIM868>3.0.CO