Neural representation of verb meaning: An fMRI study

被引:89
作者
Grossman, M
Koenig, P
DeVita, C
Glosser, G
Alsop, D
Detre, J
Gee, J
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
semantic; fMRI; verb; category-specific;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.10117
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The neural basis for verb comprehension has proven elusive, in part because of the limited range of verb categories that have been assessed. In the present study, 16 healthy young adults were probed for the meaning associated with verbs of MOTION and verbs of COGNITION. We observed distinct patterns of activation for each verb subcategory: MOTION verbs are associated with recruitment of left ventral temporal-occipital cortex, bilateral prefrontal cortex and caudate, whereas COGNITION verbs are associated with left posterolateral temporal activation. These findings are consistent with the claim that the neural representations of verb subcategories are distinct. Although the "sensory-motor" hypothesis may play a role in explaining activation associated with MOTION verbs, the left posterolateral temporal distribution of cortical activation associated with COGNITION verbs cannot be easily explained by the "sensory-motor" hypothesis. We suggest that left posterolateral temporal activation supports aspects of lexical semantic processing concerned with the neural representation of propositional knowledge contributing to COGNITION verbs. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 134
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER GE, 1990, PROG BRAIN RES, V85, P119
[2]  
Allport D.A., 1985, CURRENT PERSPECTIVES, P207
[3]  
Baker MC., 1988, INCORPORATION THEORY
[4]   The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexica: A positron emission tomography study [J].
Beauregard, M ;
Chertkow, H ;
Bub, D ;
Murtha, S ;
Dixon, R ;
Evans, A .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (04) :441-461
[5]  
Berndt RS, 1997, BRAIN LANG, V56, P68
[6]   Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits [J].
Bird, H ;
Howard, D ;
Franklin, S .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 72 (03) :246-309
[7]  
Bonda E, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P3737
[8]   Direct comparison of prefrontal cortex regions engaged by working and long-term memory tasks [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Kelley, WM ;
Buckner, RL ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Miezin, FM ;
Snyder, AZ ;
Ollinger, JM ;
Akbudak, E ;
Conturo, TE ;
Petersen, SE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (01) :48-59
[9]   REVERSAL OF THE CONCRETENESS EFFECT IN A PATIENT WITH SEMANTIC DEMENTIA [J].
BREEDIN, SD ;
SAFFRAN, EM ;
COSLETT, HB .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 11 (06) :617-660
[10]   The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: A PET study [J].
Cappa, SF ;
Perani, D ;
Schnur, T ;
Tettamanti, M ;
Fazio, F .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 8 (04) :350-359