The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia

被引:442
作者
Hitt, MA [1 ]
Ahlstrom, D
Dacin, AT
Levitas, E
Svobodina, L
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Queens Univ, Sch Business, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Business, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
[5] St Petersburg Univ Econ & Finance, St Petersburg 191023, Russia
关键词
institutional theory; strategic alliances; partner selection; transition economies; China; Russia;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1030.0045
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
China and Russia represent major economies in transition from command economies, yet their paths to the market have differed greatly. Their divergent approaches have helped create distinct institutional environments. This study focuses on a particularly important strategic decision firms face-alliance partner selection. The study's results suggest that China's more stable and supportive institutional environment has helped Chinese firms take a longer-term view of alliance partner selection, focusing more on the potential partner's intangible assets along with technological and managerial capabilities. In contrast, the less stable Russian institutional environment has influenced Russian managers to focus more on the short term, selecting partners that provide access to financial capital and complementary capabilities so as to enhance their firms' ability to weather that nation's turbulent environment. This study contributes to knowledge about the influence of the institutional environment on alliance partner selection decisions for firms domiciled in transition (and emerging) economies.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 185
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy
    Ahlstrom, D
    Bruton, GD
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (04): : 72 - 83
  • [2] [Anonymous], GLOBAL FOCUS
  • [3] [Anonymous], PARTNERING CHINESE F
  • [4] [Anonymous], WORLD COMMUNISM POLE
  • [5] Social capital and entrepreneurial performance in Russia: A longitudinal study
    Batjargal, B
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2003, 24 (04) : 535 - 556
  • [6] Bianchi C., 2002, THESIS QUEENS U KING
  • [7] Blanchard O, 2001, IMF STAFF PAPERS, V48, P171
  • [8] Brislin R.W., 1986, FIELD METHOD CROSS C, P137, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
  • [9] Bryk A.S., 1992, Hierarchical Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
  • [10] Different paths to economic reform in Russia and China: Causes and consequences
    Buck, T
    Filatotchev, I
    Nolan, P
    Wright, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2000, 35 (04) : 379 - 400