A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures

被引:319
作者
Bretz, Frank [2 ,3 ]
Maurer, W. [2 ]
Brannath, Werner
Posch, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Sect Med Stat, Core Unit Med Stat & Informat, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Biometry, D-30623 Hannover, Germany
关键词
adjusted p-values; Bonferroni; closure principle; gatekeeping procedures; multiple comparison procedures; shortcut procedures; simultaneous confidence intervals; GATEKEEPING STRATEGIES; FIXED SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.3495
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
For clinical trials with multiple treatment arms or endpoints a variety of sequentially rejective, weighted Bonferroni-type tests have been proposed, such as gatekeeping procedures, fixed sequence tests, and fallback procedures. They allow to map the difference in importance as well as the relationship between the various research questions onto an adequate multiple test procedure. Since these procedures rely on the closed test principle, they usually require the explicit specification of a large number of intersection hypotheses tests. The underlying test strategy may therefore be difficult to communicate. We propose a simple iterative graphical approach to construct and perform such Bonferroni-type tests. The resulting multiple test procedures are represented by directed. weighted graphs, where each node corresponds to an elementary hypothesis, together with a simple algorithm to generate such graphs while sequentially testing the individual hypotheses. The approach is illustrated with the visualization of several common gatekeeping strategies. A case study is used to illustrate how the methods from this article can be used to tailor a multiple test procedure to given study objectives. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 604
页数:19
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment
[2]
Bauer P, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2133, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980930)17:18<2133::AID-SIM901>3.0.CO
[3]
2-2
[4]
Bauer P, 2001, BIOMETRICAL J, V43, P605, DOI 10.1002/1521-4036(200109)43:5<605::AID-BIMJ605>3.0.CO
[5]
2-V
[6]
The application of enhanced parallel gatekeeping strategies [J].
Chen, X ;
Luo, XH ;
Capizzi, T .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (09) :1385-1397
[7]
SEQUENTIALLY REJECTIVE PAIRWISE TESTING PROCEDURES [J].
CONFORTI, M ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1987, 17 (02) :193-208
[8]
Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant [J].
Dmitrienko, A ;
Offen, WW ;
Westfall, PH .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (15) :2387-2400
[9]
Constructing multiple test procedures for partially ordered hypothesis sets [J].
Edwards, David ;
Madsen, Jesper .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (28) :5116-5124
[10]
Simultaneous Confidence Regions Corresponding to Holm's Step-Down Procedure and Other Closed-Testing Procedures [J].
Guilbaud, Olivier .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 50 (05) :678-692