Polyfunctional plants for industrial waste disposal: a case study for small enterprises

被引:3
作者
Caputo, AC [1 ]
Pelagagge, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Fac Engn, Dept Energet, I-67040 Laquila, Italy
关键词
waste treatment facility; polyfunctional plant; economic analysis; industrial waste;
D O I
10.1243/0954408991529942
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Waste production represents a very critical problem for small enterprises which have to take charge of disposal activities and their related costs but cannot afford autonomous solutions owing to technical and financial constraints. For this kind of enterprise, polyfunctional plants appear to be one of the most promising solutions that show ability in the treatment and disposal of a wide range of wastes, performing collection and storage tasks too. At the same time, such plants allow stricter environmental control, an increased reuse of both waste materials and energy and, finally, lower capital and operating costs. In this paper a case study referring to small and very small enterprises in the Rome industrial area is presented. After characterization of the reference scenario, leading to an annual amount of about 165000 tons of waste to be treated, the technoeconomic feasibility study of the plant has been carried out. Overall economic evaluation indexes and risk analysis of the investment are also presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   LIMITING ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT BY WASTE MANAGEMENT [J].
BARNARD, R ;
OLIVETTI, G .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1990, 4 (1-2) :51-62
[2]  
CAPUTO AC, 1999, IN PRESS J AIR WASTE
[3]   FORECASTING SOLID-WASTE COMPOSITION - AN IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION IN RESOURCE RECOVERY AND RECYCLING [J].
KHAN, MZA ;
BURNEY, FA .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1989, 3 (01) :1-17
[4]  
MANCINI M, 1991, RIFIUTI SOLIDI, V5, P359
[5]   A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques .2. Ratio, payback, and accounting methods [J].
Remer, DS ;
Nieto, AP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1995, 42 (02) :101-129
[6]   A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques .1. Net present value and rate of return methods [J].
Remer, DS ;
Nieto, AP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1995, 42 (01) :79-96