Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections

被引:18
作者
Walters, DJ
Solomkin, JS
Paladino, JA
机构
[1] Millard Fillmore Suburban Hosp, Clin Pharmacokinet Lab, Buffalo, NY 14221 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199916050-00011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the cost effectiveness of sequential intravenous (TV) to oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole (CIP/MTZ IV/PO) with that of IV ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole (CIP/MTZ IV) and IV imipenem-cilastatin (IMI IV) in patients with intra-abdominal infections. Design and participants: Patients enrolled in a double-blind randomised clinical trial were eligible for inclusion into this cost-effectiveness analysis, Decision analysis was used to characterise the economic outcomes between groups and provide a structure upon which to base the sensitivity analyses. 1996 cost values were used throughout. Setting: The economic perspective of the analysis was that of a hospital provider. Main outcome measures and results: Among 446 economically evaluable patients, 176 could be switched from IV to oral administration. The 51 patients randomised to CIP/MTZ IV/PO who received active oral therapy had a success rate of 98%, mean duration of therapy of 9.1 days and mean cost of $US7678. There were 125 patients randomised to either CIP/MTZ IV or IMI IV who received oral placebo while continuing on active IV antibacterials; their success rate was 94%, mean duration of therapy was 10.1 days and mean cost was $US8774_ (p = 0.029 vs CIP/MTZ IV/PO). Of the 270 patients who were unable to receive oral administration, 97 received IMI IV and had a success rate of 75%, mean duration of therapy of 13.8 days and a mean cost of $US 12 418, and 173 received CIP/MTZ IV and had a success rate of 77%, mean duration of therapy of 13.4 days and mean cast of $US 12 219 (p = 0.26 vs IMI IV). Conclusions: In patients able to receive oral therapy, sequential IV to oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was cost effective compared with full IV courses of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole or imipenem-cilastatin. In patients unable to receive oral therapy, no difference in mean cost was found between IV imipenem-cilastatin or IV ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 561
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
*AM HOSP ASS, 1995, HOSP STAT EM TRENDS, P7
[2]   Imipenem/cilastatin - An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections [J].
Balfour, JA ;
Bryson, HM ;
Brogden, RN .
DRUGS, 1996, 51 (01) :99-136
[3]  
Benfield P, 1992, Pharmacoeconomics, V1, P443
[4]   Costs, innovation and efficiency in anti-infective therapy [J].
Bootman, JL ;
Milne, RJ .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 :31-39
[6]   MEASURING COSTS AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
BULPITT, CJ ;
FLETCHER, AE .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1990, 119 (03) :766-771
[7]   COST-ANALYSIS OF IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN VERSUS CLINDAMYCIN WITH TOBRAMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTION [J].
DELISSOVOY, G ;
ELIXHAUSER, A ;
LUCE, BR ;
WESCHLER, J ;
MOWERY, P ;
REBLANDO, J ;
SOLOMKIN, J .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1993, 4 (03) :203-214
[8]   A CLINICIAN GUIDE TO COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS [J].
DETSKY, AS ;
NAGLIE, IG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (02) :147-154
[9]  
DIPIRO JT, 1995, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V15, pS15
[10]  
DRUSANO GL, 1982, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V154, P715