Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI

被引:56
作者
Bartella, L [1 ]
Liberman, L [1 ]
Morris, EA [1 ]
Dershaw, DD [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Sect, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
breast cancer; MRI;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1777
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the MRI findings and histology of clinically and mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review was undertaken of 1,336 breast MRI examinations performed during a 2-year period. Among these, 68 nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive cancers were identified in 57 women with a median age of 50 years (range, 30-72 years). MRI findings were classified according to the breast MRI lexicon. Medical records were reviewed to determine the histology. RESULTS. Indications for performing MRI were extent of disease assessment in 72% (41/57), high-risk screening in 25% (14/57), and problem solving in 3% (2/57). MRI lesion types in these 68 invasive cancers were nonmass in 57% (39/68) and mass in 43% (29/68). Kinetics were plateau in 59% (40/68), washout in 38% (26/68), and persistent in 3% (2/68). Histology was invasive ductal cancer in 65% (44/68), mixed invasive ductal and lobular cancer in 19% (13/68), and invasive lobular cancer in 16% (11/68). The cancer stage was 1 in 61% (34/56), H in 32% (18/56), and more advanced in 7% (4/56). Sixty-three percent (43/68) of lesions were minimal cancers, defined as invasive cancers measuring under 1 cm. CONCLUSION. In this study of mammographically and clinically occult cancers detected by MRI, 57% (39/68) of invasive breast cancers were evident as nonmass enhancement, and 63% were minimal breast cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 870
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]  
Dhamanaskar KP, 2002, RADIOLOGY, V225, P653
[3]   MR appearance of metastatic melanotic melanoma in the breast [J].
Ho, LWC ;
Wong, KP ;
Chan, JHM ;
Chow, LWC ;
Leung, EYF ;
Leong, L .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (07) :572-573
[4]   Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: Diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability [J].
Kinkel, K ;
Helbich, TH ;
Esserman, LJ ;
Barclay, J ;
Schwerin, EH ;
Sickles, EA ;
Hylton, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (01) :35-43
[5]  
Kuhl CK, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V9, P187, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199902)9:2<187::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-2
[7]   Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Mielcareck, P ;
Klaschik, S ;
Leutner, C ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Gieseke, J ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :101-110
[8]   Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: Utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US [J].
LaTrenta, LR ;
Menell, JH ;
Morris, EA ;
Abramson, AF ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Liberman, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) :856-861
[9]   Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: Features and positive predictive value [J].
Liberman, L ;
Morris, EA ;
Lee, MJY ;
Kaplan, JB ;
LaTrenta, LR ;
Menell, JH ;
Abramson, AF ;
Dashnaw, SM ;
Ballon, DJ ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (01) :171-178
[10]  
MARTIN JE, 1971, CANCER, V28, P1519, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197112)28:6<1519::AID-CNCR2820280627>3.0.CO