Stewardship, Paternalism and Public Health: Further Thoughts

被引：12

作者：

Baldwin, Tom ^{[2
]}

Brownsword, Roger ^{[3
]}

Schmidt, Harald ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Nuffield Council Bioeth, London WC1B 3JS, England

[2] Univ York, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England

[3] Kings Coll London, London WC2R 2LS, England

来源：

PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS | 2009年 / 2卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1093/phe/php007

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

In November 2007, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics published the report Public Health: Ethical Issues. While the report has been welcomed by a wide range of stakeholders, there has also been some criticism. First, it has been suggested that it is not clear why, in developing its 'stewardship model', the Council felt the need to go beyond the liberal position developed by John Stuart Mill-what is it that the stewardship model adds? Second, it is suggested that the Report is confused about the concept of paternalism. Third, it is argued that the discussion of the concept of stewardship is lacking in detail and substance. We clarify the Working Party's thinking regarding these three areas, which demonstrates the robustness of the framework set out in the report.

引用

页码：113 / 116

页数：4

共 8 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2008, NUDGE IMPROVING DECI, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SOSCIJ.2008.09.003

[2]

[Anonymous], 2000, World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance

[3]

[Anonymous], 2007, Public Health: Ethical Issues

[4] Harmful rights-doing? The perceived problem of liberal paradigms and public health [J].