Progressive motor deficits in lacunar infarction

被引:105
作者
Nakamura, K
Saku, Y
Ibayashi, S
Fujishima, M
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med 2, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] St Marys Hosp, Inst Neurosci, Dept Cerebrovasc Dis, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1212/WNL.52.1.29
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To study the clinical characteristics of the progression of motor deficits in lacunar stroke patients. Background: Same patients with lacunar infarction have progression of their neurologic deficits, but it is not known which patients will progress or why they progress. Methods: The authors evaluated 92 consecutive patients (47 men, 45 women; age, 69.4 +/- 10.9 years [mean +/- SD]) with first-ever stroke due to supratentorial lacunas in the internal capsule or the corona radiata. By defining lacunar infarction in which motor deficits progressed between admission and the day after admission as progressive lacunar infarction, the authors compared progressive lacunar infarction with stable lacunar infarction. Results: Of 92 patients, 25 (27%) had progression of deficits. Diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02) and severity of motor deficit on admission (p = 0.006) were related independently to progression in a logistic multiple regression analysis. Size of the infarct was slightly larger (1.2 +/- 0.4 cm(2) versus 0.9 +/- 0.5 cm(2); p = 0.01) and functional status at discharge was worse (median Barthel index, 45 versus 100; p < 0.001) in patients with progressive infarction than in those without progression. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the site of the infarct or blood pressure or hematocrit levels on or after admission. Conclusions: The progression of motor deficits is associated with a relatively poor functional outcome. Diabetes mellitus and the severity of motor deficit on admission may predict progression of motor deficits.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   GRADED NEUROLOGIC SCALE FOR USE IN ACUTE HEMISPHERIC STROKE TREATMENT PROTOCOLS [J].
ADAMS, RJ ;
MEADOR, KJ ;
SETHI, KD ;
GROTTA, JC ;
THOMSON, DS .
STROKE, 1987, 18 (03) :665-669
[2]   ANY PROGRESS ON PROGRESSING STROKE [J].
ASPLUND, K .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 1992, 2 (06) :317-319
[3]   THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF LACUNAR INFARCTION - THE OXFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY STROKE PROJECT [J].
BAMFORD, J ;
SANDERCOCK, P ;
JONES, L ;
WARLOW, C .
STROKE, 1987, 18 (03) :545-551
[4]   TREATMENT OF PROGRESSIVE STROKE [J].
CAPLAN, LR .
STROKE, 1991, 22 (05) :694-695
[5]   Progression of ischaemic stroke and excitotoxic aminoacids [J].
Castillo, J ;
Davalos, A ;
Noya, M .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9045) :79-83
[6]   DETERIORATING ISCHEMIC STROKE - RISK-FACTORS AND PROGNOSIS [J].
DAVALOS, A ;
CENDRA, E ;
TERUEL, J ;
MARTINEZ, M ;
GENIS, D .
NEUROLOGY, 1990, 40 (12) :1865-1869
[7]   HEPARIN FOR LACUNAR STROKE IN PROGRESSION [J].
DOBKIN, BH .
STROKE, 1983, 14 (03) :421-423
[8]   LACUNAR STROKES AND INFARCTS - A REVIEW [J].
FISHER, CM .
NEUROLOGY, 1982, 32 (08) :871-876
[9]   HEMOSTATIC VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS [J].
FULLER, JH ;
KEEN, H ;
JARRETT, RJ ;
OMER, T ;
MEADE, TW ;
CHAKRABARTI, R ;
NORTH, WRS ;
STIRLING, Y .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 2 (6196) :964-966
[10]   STROKE-IN-PROGRESSION [J].
GAUTIER, JC .
STROKE, 1985, 16 (04) :729-733