The effectiveness of a nurse-managed perinatal smoking cessation program implemented in a rural county

被引:15
作者
Britton, GRA
Brinthaupt, J
Stehle, JM
James, GD
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Decker Sch Nursing, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[2] Ivy Obstet & Gynecol, Elmira, NY USA
[3] Arnot Ogden Med Ctr, Elmira, NY USA
[4] SUNY Binghamton, Inst Primary & Preventat Hlth Care, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14622200500431536
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
The present study ( a) examined the effectiveness of a nurse-managed smoking cessation program, that was totally integrated into routine perinatal care, on the cessation rates of pregnant smokers in a rural community, and (b) assessed the subject characteristics associated with smoking cessation success. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 194 pregnant women who stated that they were smokers at the onset of their pregnancies. The study compared the effects of usual care (n=93) versus the Smoke Free Baby & Me program (n=101), which included the American Cancer Society's Make Yours a Fresh Start Family program. Smoking status was measured by self-report and urinary cotinine at four points during pregnancy and postpartum. At the postpartum visit, more women in the experimental group reported that they were not smoking compared with those in the control group (37.3% vs. 16.7%), Pearson's x(2) (n=87)=4.37, p=.037, and they had higher validated (urinary cotinine < 200 ng/ml) smoking cessation rates (n=80, t=2.449, p=.017) if they had quit smoking by the first prenatal visit. Smoking cessation was positively associated with level of education and negatively associated with gravidity, parity, the number of smokers in the household, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day at the first prenatal visit. Significant discordance was found between self-report and urinary cotinine assays at all prevalence points, regardless of group. In conclusion, this nurse-delivered program integrated into perinatal care influenced the smoking behaviors of "recent quitters'' but had no effect on those who reported smoking at the first prenatal visit. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 28
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ADAMS MM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P738
[2]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1995, WHY START LIF UND CL
[3]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1996, MAK YOURS FRESH STAR
[4]  
*AM LUNG ASS, 2001, YOU YOUR BAB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Health Education Journal
[6]  
Britton G A, 1998, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V27, P241, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02645.x
[7]  
BRITTON GR, 1998, SMOKE FREE BABY ME
[8]   Comparison of self-reported smoking and urinary cotinine levels in a rural pregnant population [J].
Britton, GRA ;
Brinthaupt, J ;
Stehle, JM ;
James, GD .
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2004, 33 (03) :306-311
[9]  
*CDCP, 1997, MORBIDITY MORTALITY, V40, P1048
[10]   Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy in ten states [J].
Colman, GJ ;
Joyce, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 24 (01) :29-35