Comparison of new generation low-complexity flood inundation mapping tools with a hydrodynamic model

被引:131
作者
Afshari, Shahab [1 ]
Tavakoly, Ahmad A. [2 ]
Rajib, Mohammad Adnan [3 ]
Zheng, Xing [4 ]
Follum, Michael L. [2 ]
Omranian, Ehsan [5 ]
Fekete, Balazs M. [6 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, CREST Inst, City Coll New York, Environm CrossRd Initiat,Dept Civil Engn, 160 Convent Ave,Marshak Rm 826, New York, NY 10031 USA
[2] US Army, Coastal & Hydraul Lab, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, 3909 Halls Ferry Rd, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, 550 W Stadium Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[6] CUNY, CREST Inst, City Coll New York, Environm CrossRd Initiat,Dept Civil Engn, Steinman Hall,Room 188,160 Convent Ave, New York, NY 10031 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
Hyper-resolution modeling; AutoRoute; HAND; HEC-RAS; 2D; Multi-model comparison; National Water Model; RASTER-BASED MODEL; TOPOGRAPHIC DATA; HYDRAULIC MODEL; RESOLUTION; 1D; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.036
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to compare two new generation low-complexity tools, AutoRoute and Height Above the Nearest Drainage (HAND), with a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model (Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System, HEC-RAS 2D). The assessment was conducted on two hydrologically different and geographically distant test-cases in the United States, including the 16,900 km2 Cedar River (CR) watershed in Iowa and a 62 km2 domain along the Black Warrior River (BWR) in Alabama. For BWR, twelve different configurations were set up for each of the models, including four different terrain setups (e.g. with and without channel bathymetry and a levee), and three flooding conditions representing moderate to extreme hazards at 10-, 100-, and 500-year return periods. For the CR watershed, models were compared with a simplistic terrain setup (without bathymetry and any form of hydraulic controls) and one flooding condition (100-year return period). Input streamfiow forcing data representing these hypothetical events were constructed by applying a new fusion approach on National Water Model outputs. Simulated inundation extent and depth from AutoRoute, HAND, and HEC-RAS 2D were compared with one another and with the corresponding FEMA reference estimates. Irrespective of the configurations, the low-complexity models were able to produce inundation extents similar to HECRAS 2D, with AutoRoute showing slightly higher accuracy than the HAND model. Among four terrain setups, the one including both levee and channel bathymetry showed lowest fitness score on the spatial agreement of inundation extent, due to the weak physical representation of low-complexity models compared to a hydrodynamic model. For inundation depth, the low-complexity models showed an overestimating tendency, especially in the deeper segments of the channel. Based on such reasonably good prediction skills, low-complexity flood models can be considered as a suitable alternative for fast predictions in large-scale hyper-resolution operational frameworks, without completely overriding hydrodynamic models' efficacy. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 556
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Afshari Shahab., 2016, National Water Center Innovators Program Summer Institute Report, P19
  • [2] GloFAS - global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning
    Alfieri, L.
    Burek, P.
    Dutra, E.
    Krzeminski, B.
    Muraro, D.
    Thielen, J.
    Pappenberger, F.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (03) : 1161 - 1175
  • [3] Advances in pan-European flood hazard mapping
    Alfieri, Lorenzo
    Salamon, Peter
    Bianchi, Alessandra
    Neal, Jeffrey
    Bates, Paul
    Feyen, Luc
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (13) : 4067 - 4077
  • [4] Comparing a 1D hydraulic model with a 2D hydraulic model for the simulation of extreme glacial outburst floods
    Alho, Petteri
    Aaltonen, Juha
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (10) : 1537 - 1547
  • [5] [Anonymous], EA133C05CQ1048 NOAA
  • [6] [Anonymous], DES DEF REP ENV ASS
  • [7] [Anonymous], J ENG MECH ASCE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 20075204 US GEOL SUR
  • [9] [Anonymous], 3 INT C CYBERGIS GEO
  • [10] [Anonymous], COMBINE 1D 2D MODELI