When to parasitize? A dynamic optimization model of reproductive strategies in a cooperative breeder

被引:42
作者
Skubic, E
Taborsky, M
McNamara, JM
Houston, AI
机构
[1] Austrian Acad Sci, Konrad Lorenz Inst Comparat Ethol, A-1160 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Behav Ecol, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Math, Bristol BS8 1TW, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol BS8 1UG, Avon, England
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
cooperative breeding; reproductive share; state dependence; dynamic programming; Cichlid fish;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.021
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We consider a cooperatively breeding group and find the optimal pattern of reproductive parasitism by a subordinate helper as a function of its body size, and hence the share of reproduction obtained by the subordinate. We develop the model for the social system of the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish Neolamprologus Pulcher but the general framework is also applicable to other cooperative systems. In addition to behaving cooperatively by sharing tasks, sexually mature male cichlid helpers may directly parasitize the reproduction of dominant breeders in the group. We investigate the relative influence of life history and behavioural variables including growth, parasitism capacity, future reproductive fitness benefits and costs, relatedness and expulsion risk on the optimal reproductive strategy of subordinates. In a detailed analysis of the parameter space we show that a male helper should base its decision to parasitize primarily on an increase in expulsion risk resulting from reproductive parasitism (punishment), intra-group relatedness and the parasitism capacity. If expulsion risk is high then helpers should not parasitize reproduction at medium body size but should parasitize either when small or large. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 501
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher) [J].
Balshine, S ;
Leach, B ;
Neat, F ;
Reid, H ;
Taborsky, M ;
Werner, N .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2001, 50 (02) :134-140
[2]  
Bellman R., 1957, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
[3]  
Boulikas T., 1998, GENE THER MOL BIOL, V1, P1
[4]  
Cichon M, 2000, EVOL ECOL RES, V2, P857
[5]  
Clark C. W., 2000, OX ECOL EV
[6]   DYNAMIC-MODELS OF BEHAVIOR - AN EXTENSION OF LIFE-HISTORY THEORY [J].
CLARK, CW .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1993, 8 (06) :205-209
[7]   Reproductive skew, concessions and limited control [J].
Clutton-Brock, TH .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (07) :288-292
[8]  
DEANGELIS DL, 1982, T AM FISH SOC, V111, P384, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1982)111<384:GOBSDI>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish [J].
Dierkes, P ;
Taborsky, M ;
Kohler, U .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 10 (05) :510-515