Influence of urea fertilization and urease inhibitor on the size and activity of the soil microbial biomass under conventional and zero tillage at two sites

被引:25
作者
Banerjee, MR
Burton, DL [1 ]
Grant, CA
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Soil Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Res Ctr, Brandon, MB R7A 5Y3, Canada
关键词
soil biological quality; soil type; urease inhibitor; conventional tillage; zero tillage;
D O I
10.4141/S97-049
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Fertilizers are frequently used in agriculture to enhance crop yield and quality. Increasingly, microbial and enzyme inhibitors are being used to enhance the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen use. The assumption being made is that the impact of these compounds is short-term or localized and thus does not adversely impact soil quality. This study investigates the implications of urea fertilizer with and without urease inhibitor [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide, NBPT], conventional and zero tillage systems,and soil types on the soil biological characteristics including N mineralization. Microplot studies were conducted in clay loam and fine sandy loam soils in Manitoba. Soil type had a significant effect on the soil organic C but tillage did not have any significant effect. Soil microbial biomass C content ranged widely (131-1215 mu g g(-1) soil). The clay loam soil generally tended to contain higher biomass C than the sandy loam soil. The potential soil mineral N production (N-0) was higher in clay loam soil (92.6 mu g g(-1) soil) than sandy loam soil (40.2 mu g g(-1) soil). Tillage systems, urea and urease inhibitor application had no significant impact on the soil biomass C, N-0, arylsulfatase or acid and alkaline phosphatase content. At these sites considerable fluctuations occurred in the microbial and biochemical properties due to the variation of soil type. In general, these fluctuations were mainly related to soil organic matter and soil moisture content. Tillage system, urea with and without NBPT application did not contribute any notable impact on the soil biological properties reported in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 263
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
*AB CONC INC, 1991, SUP ANOVA 1 11
[2]  
ACTON DF, 1995, PUBL AGR AGR CAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SOIL SAMPLING METHOD
[5]   THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS DYNAMICS IN SOILS [J].
BOSATTA, E ;
AGREN, GI .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 26 (01) :143-148
[6]   Net nitrogen mineralization from a gray Luvisol under diverse cropping systems in the Peace River region of Alberta [J].
Broersma, K ;
Juma, NG ;
Robertson, JA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1996, 76 (02) :117-123
[7]   EFFECTS OF UREASE INHIBITORS ON NITRIFICATION IN SOILS [J].
BUNDY, LG ;
BREMNER, JM .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1974, 6 (01) :27-30
[8]   ROLE OF ENZYME STABILITY IN CONTROLLING HISTIDINE DEAMINATING ACTIVITY IN SOIL [J].
BURTON, DL ;
MCGILL, WB .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 21 (07) :903-910
[9]   Long-term effects of tillage and crop rotations on soil organic C and total N in a clay soil in southwestern Saskatchewan [J].
Campbell, CA ;
McConkey, BG ;
Zentner, RP ;
Selles, F ;
Curtin, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1996, 76 (03) :395-401