Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences

被引:32
作者
Antelman, K [1 ]
机构
[1] NCSU Libs, Informat Technol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1087/095315106776387011
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so-called 'green' road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers' self-archiving Policies have no influence on author self-archiving Practice.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? [J].
Antelman, K .
COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2004, 65 (05) :372-382
[2]  
BECHER T, 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR, pCH9
[3]  
Frankel MS, 2000, LEARN PUBL, V13, P251
[4]  
FRY J, 2004, INFORM PROCESSING MA, V42, P299
[5]   RoMEO studies 4: an analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements [J].
Gadd, E ;
Oppenheim, C ;
Probets, S .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2003, 16 (04) :293-308
[6]  
GADD E, 2003, J LIBR INF SCI, V35, P7
[7]  
GADD E, 2003, J DOC, V59, P256
[8]  
GOODMAN D, 2004, SERIALS REV, V30, P260
[9]  
GUEDON JC, 2004, SERIALS REV, V30, P316
[10]  
HARNAD S, 2004, D LIB MAGAZINE JUN