Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β-tricalcium phosphate.: A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs

被引:276
作者
Jensen, SS
Broggini, N
Hjorting-Hansen, E
Schenk, R
Buser, D
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
anorganic bovine bone; autograft; bone regeneration; bone substitute; experimental study; tricalcium phosphate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01257.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the bone formation and graft resorption of two different bone substitutes used in both orthopedic and oral surgery, with autogenous bone as a positive control. Materials and methods: Three standardized bone defects were prepared in both mandibular angles of 12 adult minipigs. The defects were grafted with either autograft, anorganic bovine bone (ABB), or synthetic beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP). Sacrifice was performed after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Results: At 2 weeks, more new bone formation was seen in defects filled with autograft than with ABB (P similar to 0.0005) and beta-TCP (P similar to 0.002). After 4 weeks, there was no significant difference between beta-TCP and the two other materials. Defects grafted with ABB still exhibited less bone formation as compared with autograft (P similar to 0.004). At 8 weeks, more bone formation was observed in defects grafted with autograft (P similar to 0.003) and beta-TCP (P similar to 0.00004) than with ABB. No difference could be demonstrated between beta-TCP and autograft. beta-TCP resorbed almost completely over 8 weeks, whereas ABB remained stable. Conclusion: Both bone substitutes seemed to decelerate bone regeneration in the early healing phase as compared with autograft. All defects ultimately regenerated with newly formed bone and a developing bone marrow. The grafting materials showed complete osseous integration. Both bone substitutes may have a place in reconstructive surgery where different clinical indications require differences in biodegradability.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Artzi Z, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P357
  • [2] Bohner M, 2000, Injury, V31 Suppl 4, P37
  • [3] BURCHARDT H, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P28
  • [4] Evaluation of filling materials in membrane-protected bone defects - A comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs
    Buser, D
    Hoffmann, B
    Bernard, JP
    Lussi, A
    Mettler, D
    Schenk, RK
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (03) : 137 - 150
  • [5] EGGLI PS, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P127
  • [6] Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests
    Haas, R
    Mailath, G
    Dortbudak, O
    Watzek, G
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [7] The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants
    Hammerle, CHF
    Chiantella, GC
    Karring, T
    Lang, NP
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (03) : 151 - 162
  • [8] Bone grafting to the jaws with special reference to reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. A historical review.
    Hjørting-Hansen E.
    [J]. Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, 2002, 6 (1): : 6 - 14
  • [9] Jensen S S, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P55
  • [10] Jensen SS, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P703