Nitrogen recovery from controlled-release fertilizers under intermittent leaching and dry cycles

被引:21
作者
Paramasivam, S [1 ]
Alva, AK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA,CTR CITRUS RES & EDUC,IFAS,LAKE ALFRED,FL 33850
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00010694-199706000-00007
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The efficiency of nitrogen (N) use by crop plants depends, in part, on the leaching losses below the rooting depth in soils. A leaching column study was conducted to evaluate N transformation and leaching from three urea- based Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRF) and uncoated urea applied to a sandy soil. Each leaching was followed by 6 days of incubation at 33-35 degrees C. After 18 leaching and dry cycles (3960 mt of water leached, equivalent to 90-cm rainfall), recovery of total N (sum of all forms in the leachate, residual soil N, and residual fertilizer N) accounted for 89, 85, 84, and 45% of the total N applied as Poly-S, Meister, Osmocote, and Urea, respectively. Cumulative N forms in 3960 mL leachate accounted for 59, 44, 33, and 28% of total N applied as Poly-S, Urea, Osmocote, and Meister, respectively. Leachate N accounted for 98% of total N recovery from uncoated urea, and 60% of leachate N was in Urea-N form. Cumulative NO3--N in 3960 mL leachate accounted for 80, 98, 97, and 24% of the total N leached from Poly-S, Meister, Osmocote, and Urea amended soil columns, respectively. Soil residual N, (sum of NH4+-N and NO3--N) after completion of 18 leaching and dry cycles, accounted for 11, 9, 3 and 0.9% of total N applied as Meister, Poly-S, Osmocote, and Urea, respectively. No fertilizer residue was recovered in the urea treatment. In the case of the CRF sources, the residual fertilizer N accounted for 48, 45, and 22% of total N applied as Osmocote, Meister, and Poly-S, respectively. Among the CRF products, longevity of release was significantly greater for the Meister and Osmocote compared with Poly-S.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*ALPK CORP, 1989, A303S020 ALPK CORP
[2]  
*ALPK CORP, 1986, A303S170 ALPK CORP
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL LEACHING OF NUTRIENTS FROM SOLUBLE VS CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS [J].
ALVA, AK .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 16 (06) :769-776
[4]  
Bremner J.M., 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL PA, P1179
[5]   REDUCING NITROGEN LEACHING-LOSSES FROM CONTAINERIZED PLANTS - THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLLED-RELEASE FERTILIZERS [J].
COX, DA .
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1993, 16 (03) :533-545
[6]   SIMULTANEOUS NITRIFICATION AND DIFFUSION IN SOIL .5. THE EFFECTS OF PH CHANGE, FOLLOWING THE ADDITION OF AMMONIUM-SULFATE, ON THE ACTIVITY OF NITRIFIERS [J].
DARRAH, PR ;
NYE, PH ;
WHITE, RE .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1986, 37 (03) :479-484
[7]   NITROGEN-BALANCE IN A CITRUS ORCHARD [J].
DASBERG, S ;
ERNER, Y ;
BIELORAI, H .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1984, 13 (03) :353-356
[8]  
DOUGLAS L A, 1970, Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, V34, P859
[9]  
EMBLETON T W, 1986, Applied Agricultural Research, V1, P57
[10]  
Ferguson J. J., 1988, Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, V101, P17