Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma

被引:104
作者
Heriot, AG
Grundy, A
Kumar, D
机构
[1] St George Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London SW17 0QT, England
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Radiol, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00996.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The development of treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including local excision, total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiotherapy, has increased the importance of accurate preoperative staging to allow the optimum treatment to be selected. Methods: A literature review was undertaken of methods of preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma and the evidence for each was evaluated critically. Results: Clinical assessment of rectal carcinoma may give an indication of fixity but is not accurate for staging. Endoanal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radioimmunoscintigraphy and positron emission tomography have all been used for staging. The extent of tumour spread through the bowel wall (T stage) is most accurately assessed by endoanal ultrasonography, although this technique is poor at assessing tumour extension into adjacent organs for which both CT and MRI are more accurate. No method accurately determines lymph node involvement, but endoanal ultrasonography is the best available. Liver metastases may be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography, CT, MRI and CT portography (with increasing sensitivity and cost in that order). Conclusion: Endoanal ultrasonography is the most effective method of local tumour staging, with the addition of either CT or MRT if adjacent organ involvement is suspected. Abdominal ultrasonography or CT is recommended for routine preoperative assessment of the liver.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 28
页数:12
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]   IN-111 LABELED MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY IMMUNOSCINTIGRAPHY IN COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA - SAFETY, SENSITIVITY, AND PRELIMINARY CLINICAL-RESULTS [J].
ABDELNABI, H ;
DOERR, RJ ;
CHAN, HW ;
BALU, D ;
SCHMELTER, RF ;
MAGUIRE, RT .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (01) :163-171
[2]  
*AJCC CANC, 1992, MAN STAG CANC
[3]   Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer [J].
Akasu, T ;
Sugihara, K ;
Moriya, Y ;
Fujita, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (10) :S10-S15
[4]  
AKASU T, 1990, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V98, P268
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SURG COLON RECTUM
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF TUMOR-CELL DNA ABNORMALITIES ON SURVIVAL IN COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
ARMITAGE, NC ;
ROBINS, RA ;
EVANS, DF ;
TURNER, DR ;
BALDWIN, RW ;
HARDCASTLE, JD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (10) :828-830
[7]   THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF DIRECT EXTENSION OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM [J].
ASTLER, VB ;
COLLER, FA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1954, 139 (06) :846-852
[8]   CARCINOMA OF THE COLON - DETECTION AND PREOPERATIVE STAGING BY CT [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
HULNICK, D ;
NAIDICH, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 150 (02) :301-306
[9]   LOCAL EXCISION OF RECTAL TUMORS [J].
BANERJEE, AK ;
JEHLE, EC ;
SHORTHOUSE, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (09) :1165-1173
[10]  
BEATTY JD, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, pS922