Effective gene transfer to solid tumors using different nonviral gene delivery techniques: Electroporation, liposomes, and integrin-targeted vector

被引:82
作者
Cemazar, M
Sersa, G
Wilson, J
Tozer, GM
Hart, SL
Grosel, A
Dachs, GU
机构
[1] Inst Oncol, Dept Tumor Biol, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Mt Vernon Hosp, Tumor Microcirculat Grp, Gray Canc Inst, Northwood HA6 2JR, Middx, England
[3] UCL, Inst Child Hlth, Mol Immunol Unit, London WC1N 1EH, England
关键词
electroporation; lipofectin; integrin-targeted peptide; green fluorescence protein; tumor models;
D O I
10.1038/sj.cgt.7700454
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this study, we measured transfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo using the following nonviral approaches of gene delivery: injection of plasmid DNA, electroporation-assisted, liposome-enhanced, and integrin-targeted gene delivery, as well as the combination of these methods. Four histologically different tumor models were transfected with a plasmid encoding the green fluorescent protein (GFP) (B16 mouse melanoma, P22 rat carcinosarcoma, SaF mouse sarcoma, and T24 human bladder carcinoma) using adherent cells, dense cell suspensions, and solid tumors. Emphasis was placed on different electroporation conditions to optimise the duration and amplitude of the electric pulses, as well as on different DNA concentrations for effective gene delivery. In addition, transfection efficiency was correlated with cell density of the tumors. The major in vivo findings were: (a) electroporation-assisted gene delivery with plasmid DNA, employing long electric pulses with low amplitude, yielded significantly better GFP expression than short electric pulses with high amplitude; (b) electroporation combined with liposome-DNA complexes yielded the highest percentage of transfected tumor area in B16F1 tumor (6%); (c) transfection efficiency of electroporation-assisted plasmid DNA delivery was dependent on tumor type; (d) integrin-targeted vector, alone or combined with electroporation, was largely ineffective. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that some nonviral methods of gene delivery are feasible and efficient In transfecting solid tumors. Therefore, this makes nonviral methods attractive for further development.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 406
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RADIOL ONCOL
[2]  
Baba M, 2000, INT J CANCER, V85, P260, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000115)85:2<260::AID-IJC18>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-R
[4]   Efficient DNA electrotransfer into tumors [J].
Bettan, M ;
Ivanov, MA ;
Mir, LM ;
Boissière, F ;
Delaere, P ;
Scherman, D .
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2000, 52 (01) :83-90
[5]  
Cemazar M, 1998, ELECTRO MAGNETOBIOL, V17, P263
[6]  
Cemazar M, 1998, ANTI-CANCER DRUG, V9, P525
[7]  
Coralli C, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P4784
[8]  
Cotten Matt, 1993, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, V4, P705, DOI 10.1016/0958-1669(93)90053-Y
[9]   ADENOVIRUS ENHANCEMENT OF TRANSFERRIN POLYLYSINE-MEDIATED GENE DELIVERY [J].
CURIEL, DT ;
AGARWAL, S ;
WAGNER, E ;
COTTEN, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1991, 88 (19) :8850-8854
[10]   Gene delivery to hypoxic cells in vitro [J].
Dachs, GU ;
Coralli, C ;
Hart, SL ;
Tozer, GM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (05) :662-667