Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures

被引:486
作者
Johansson-Skoeldberg, Ulla [1 ,2 ]
Woodilla, Jill
Cetinkaya, Mehves
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Business & Design Lab, S-41124 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12023
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper takes a critical look at the design thinking discourse, one that has different meanings depending on its context. Within the managerial realm, design thinking has been described as the best way to be creative and innovate, while within the design realm, design thinking may be partly ignored and taken for granted, despite a long history of academic development and debate. In the design area, we find five different discourses of designerly thinking', or ways to describe what designers do in practice, that have distinctly different epistemological roots. These different discourses do not stand in competition with each other but could be developed in parallel. We also observe that the management discourse has three distinct origins, but in general has a more superficial and popular character and is less academically anchored than the designerly one. Also, the management design thinking discourse seldom refers to designerly thinking and thereby hinders cumulative knowledge construction. We suggest further research to link the discourses.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 146
页数:26
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Ambrose G., 2010, BASICS DESIGN 08 DES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DESIGN THINKING IS F
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DESIGN STUD, DOI [10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00044-1, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00044-1]
[4]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHANGE DESIGN DESIGN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The sciences of the artificial
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, DESIGN DRIVEN INNOVA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J BUS STRAT
[9]  
Bate P., 2007, J APPL BEHAV SCI, V43, P8
[10]  
Bell S.J., 2008, AM LIBR, V39, P44, DOI DOI 10.34944/DSPACE/11