Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

被引:59
作者
Gibbs, P [1 ]
Liney, GP [1 ]
Lowry, M [1 ]
Kneeshaw, PJ [1 ]
Turnbull, LW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Postgrad Med Inst, Div Canc, Ctr MR Invest, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
breast cancer; contrast enhanced MRI; small lesions;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2003.10.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work is to assess the additional benefit of MRI-based morphology and quantification of contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of sub-1 cm breast lesions. Forty-three women with suspected breast cancer were examined using X-ray mammography, ultrasound mammography, and MRI. Dynamic contrast imaging was performed and relative enhancement at various time-points was calculated. The dynamic data was also processed using a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Radiological interpretation of high-resolution post-contrast images revealed a similar accuracy (69%) compared to X-ray mammography (69%) and ultrasound mammography (67%). The best individual parameter calculated from the dynamic images was found to be the exchange rate constant which revealed a diagnostic accuracy of 0.74+/-0.08. When information from the post-contrast images and dynamic data was combined in a logistic regression model a diagnostic accuracy of 0.92+/-0.03 was achieved. In conclusion, MR imaging of small breast lesions is feasible and the incorporation of quantitative MR derived parameters is beneficial. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Cady B, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P301
[2]   MR IMAGING-GUIDED BREAST INTERVENTION - EXPERIENCE WITH 2 SYSTEMS [J].
FISCHER, U ;
VOSSHENRICH, R ;
DOLER, W ;
HAMADEH, A ;
OESTMANN, JW ;
GRABBE, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (02) :533-538
[3]  
GARDNER MJ, 1989, STAT CONFIDENCE, P28
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF BREAST-CANCER RECURRENCE WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR-IMAGING - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS IN 26 PATIENTS [J].
GILLES, R ;
GUINEBRETIERE, JM ;
SHAPEERO, LG ;
LESNIK, A ;
CONTESSO, G ;
SARRAZIN, D ;
MASSELOT, J ;
VANEL, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (02) :473-478
[5]  
GRIBBESTAD IS, 1994, RADIOLOGY, V191, P41
[6]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[7]   The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data [J].
Hart, D ;
Shochat, E ;
Agur, Z .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (03) :382-387
[8]   PROTOTYPE BREAST COIL FOR MR-GUIDED NEEDLE LOCALIZATION [J].
HEYWANGKOBRUNNER, SH ;
HUYNH, AT ;
VIEHWEG, P ;
HANKE, W ;
REQUARDT, H ;
PAPROSCH, I .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1994, 18 (06) :876-881
[9]   PHARMACOKINETIC MAPPING OF THE BREAST - A NEW METHOD FOR DYNAMIC MR MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
HOFFMANN, U ;
BRIX, G ;
KNOPP, MV ;
HESS, T ;
LORENZ, WJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (04) :506-514
[10]   DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED AND FAT-SUPPRESSED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN SUSPECTED RECURRENT CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST - PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE [J].
KERSLAKE, RW ;
FOX, JN ;
CARLETON, PJ ;
IMRIE, MJ ;
COOK, AM ;
BOWSLEY, SJ ;
HORSMAN, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (804) :1158-1168