Performance in Public Organizations: Clarifying the Conceptual Space

被引:120
作者
Andersen, Lotte Bogh [1 ,2 ]
Boesen, Andreas [3 ]
Pedersen, Lene Holm [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Danish Inst Local & Reg Govt Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Business Sch, Publ Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL FACTORS; GOAL AMBIGUITY; MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; COMMITMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/puar.12578
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Performance in public organizations is a key concept that requires clarification. Based on a conceptual review of research published in 10 public administration journals, this article proposes six distinctions to describe the systematic differences in performance criteria : From which stakeholder's perspective is performance being assessed? Are the criteria formal or informal? Are the criteria subjective? Which process focus and product focus do they have, if any? What is the unit of analysis? Based on these distinctions, the performance criteria of existing studies used in an empirical review of management and performance are classified. The results illustrate how a systematization of the conceptual space of performance in public organizations can help researchers select what to study and what to leave out with greater accuracy while also bringing greater clarity to public debates about performance.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research [J].
Adcock, R ;
Collier, D .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) :529-546
[2]   The Performance Puzzle: Understanding the Factors Influencing Alternative Dimensions and Views of Performance [J].
Amirkhanyan, Anna A. ;
Kim, Hyun Joon ;
Lambright, Kristina T. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2014, 24 (01) :1-34
[3]  
Andersen L. B., 2005, OFFENTLIGT ANSATTES
[4]   How Does Public Service Motivation Among Teachers Affect Student Performance in Schools? [J].
Andersen, Lotte Bogh ;
Heinesen, Eskil ;
HolmPedersen, Lene .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2014, 24 (03) :651-671
[5]   Policy Stability and Organizational Performance: Is There a Relationship? [J].
Andersen, Simon Calmar ;
Mortensen, Peter B. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2010, 20 (01) :1-22
[6]   Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis [J].
Andrews, R ;
Boyne, GA ;
Walker, RM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (01) :52-63
[7]   External constraints on local service standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government [J].
Andrews, R ;
Boyne, GA ;
Law, J ;
Walker, RM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 83 (03) :639-656
[8]  
Andrews R. M., 2006, PUBLIC SERVICE PERFO, P314
[9]   VERTICAL STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT AND PUBLIC SERVICE PERFORMANCE [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Boyne, George A. ;
Meier, Kenneth J. ;
O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. ;
Walker, Richard M. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2012, 90 (01) :77-98
[10]   The Impact of Management on Administrative and Survey Measures of Organizational Performance [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Boyne, George ;
Walker, Richard .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 13 (02) :227-255