Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:84
作者
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios [1 ]
Giannakou, Andry [2 ]
Yung, Diana E. [3 ]
Dabos, Konstantinos J. [1 ]
Plevris, John N. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Ctr Liver & Digest Disorders, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Capsule endoscopy; Completion rate; Daikenchuto; Erythromycin; Lubiprostone; Metoclopramide; Mosapride; Motility; Prokinetics; Real-time viewer; RIGHT LATERAL POSITION; TRANSIT-TIME; DIAGNOSTIC YIELD; ERYTHROMYCIN; QUALITY; METOCLOPRAMIDE; GUIDELINES; DECREASES; MOSAPRIDE; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1185/03007995.2013.818532
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: The use of purging for bowel cleansing prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has now been established in clinical practice. Despite that, the number of incomplete SBCEs is still around 15-20%. To date, the use of prokinetics in SBCE -aiming to improve completion rate (CR) - remains a contentious issue resulting in lack of consensus among capsule experts. Methods: Extensive medical literature searches were conducted (to November 2012), using suitable MeSH terms and keywords, in search of studies that compared capsule ingestion with prokinetic agents vs. controls or placebo. We examined the effects of prokinetic administration on SBCE CR (primary end point), as well as on the following secondary end points: diagnostic yield (DY), gastric transit time (GTT) and small-bowel transit time (SBTT) by meta-analysis of all relevant studies. Results: A total of 17 eligible studies (14 prospective, 3 retrospective) were identified, including 1028 individuals who ingested the capsule with no prokinetic vs. 876 who received a prokinetic. Overall, there was a higher CR in patients who ingested the capsule with prokinetics vs. controls (OR [95% CI]: 1.96 [1.38-2.78]). Of the two most readily available prokinetics, metoclopramide was associated with superior SBCE CR vs. control (OR [95% CI]: 2.8 [1.35-3.21]), while erythromycin showed no benefit (OR [95% CI]: 1.36 [0.61-3.03]). Where prokinetics were used alone, neither metoclopramide nor erythromycin showed any benefit on CR. There was no benefit of prokinetics (over controls) on DY. However, metoclopramide had a significant effect on GTT and SBTT. Limitations: The majority of the included studies were heterogeneous, and the effect of prokinetics on image quality and mucosal visualization was not examined. Conclusion: Our pooled data shows that the use of prokinetics for capsule ingestion improves CR in SBCE. This effect appears to be particularly evident with metoclopramide, when used concurrently with purging and/or use of real-time monitoring. In a small number of studies, erythromycin showed - through its gastrokinetic effect - marginal benefit. No prokinetic has a beneficial effect on SBCE DY.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1185
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]
The Effect of Metoclopramide in Capsule Enteroscopy [J].
Almeida, Nuno ;
Figueiredo, Pedro ;
Freire, Paulo ;
Lopes, Sandra ;
Lerias, Clotilde ;
Gouveia, Hermano ;
Leitao, Maximino Correia .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2010, 55 (01) :153-157
[2]
[Anonymous], ACCELERATING CAPSULE
[3]
[Anonymous], CAN J GASTROENTER SB
[4]
[Anonymous], 2000, Methods for meta-analysis in medical research
[5]
[Anonymous], FDA ANN DISC MARK GI
[6]
[Anonymous], SHIJIE HUAREN XIAOHU
[7]
[Anonymous], GASTROENTEROL RES PR
[8]
[Anonymous], METAN STATA MODULE F
[9]
Right lateral position does not affect gastric transit times of video capsule endoscopy: a prospective study [J].
Aparicio, Jose R. ;
Martinez, Juan ;
Casellas, Juan A. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (01) :34-37
[10]
Clinical trial: effectiveness of chewing-gum in accelerating capsule endoscopy transit time - a prospective randomized, controlled pilot study [J].
Apostolopoulos, P. ;
Kalantzis, C. ;
Gralnek, I. M. ;
Liatsos, C. ;
Tsironis, C. ;
Kalantzis, N. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 28 (04) :405-411