How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth?

被引:92
作者
Yang, H
Kramer, MS
Platt, RW
Blondel, B
Bréart, G
Morin, I
Wilkins, R
Usher, R
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[3] INSERM, Epidemiol Res Unit Perinatal & Womens Hlth, Villejuif, France
[4] STAT Canada, Hlth Anal & Modelling Grp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
关键词
preterm birth; gestational age; ultrasound scan; ovulation;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.120487
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Early ultrasound scanning estimation of gestational age is known to increase the reported preterm delivery rate (<37 completed weeks) compared with estimation by date of the last normal menstrual period, but it is unclear how this systematic difference arises. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a hospital-based study of 44,623 women who delivered a live-born or stillborn infant between January 1, 1978, and March 31, 1996, and who had both last normal menstrual period-based and early (usually at 16-18 weeks) ultrasound scan-based gestational age estimates. Cross-classification of the 2 estimates by completed weeks was used to examine the direction and magnitude of the differences between them and to compare the resulting classifications of preterm birth. RESULTS: The early ultrasound scan-based gestational age distribution was shifted uniformly to the left (ie, lower gestational age) relative to the last normal menstrual period gestational age distribution; the early ultrasound scan-based preterm delivery rate was 9.1%, which was 19.5% (n = 659 births) higher than the 7.6% rate by last normal menstrual period (P < .0001). The last normal menstrual period estimate exceeded the early ultrasound scan estimate far more often than the reverse, up to and including early ultrasound scan estimates of 40 weeks. No concentration of 4-week discrepancies was observed in either direction, as would be expected with random or systematic errors in recall of the last normal menstrual period. The absolute number of births at 37 to 39 weeks of gestation (by last normal menstrual period) that were reclassified as preterm (n = 1206 births) was much higher than the number of preterm births at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation that were reclassified as term (n = 581 births). The net increase of 625 preterm births (from 581 to 1206 births) that resulted from reclassification of births at 37 to 39 last normal menstrual period weeks accounted for 95% of the total 659-birth increase in early ultrasound scan-based preterm births at all last normal menstrual period gestational ages. CONCLUSION: Early ultrasound scanning reduces the gestational age estimate across the entire gestational age range; early ultrasound scan-based reclassification of gestational age results in a substantial increase in the prevalence of preterm births. Small downward reclassifications exceed upward reclassifications of similar magnitude, which is consistent with previous reports that delayed (>14 days) ovulation is more frequent than early (<14 days) ovulation.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 437
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CLASSICAL AND TRUE GESTATIONAL POSTMATURITY [J].
BOYCE, A ;
MAYAUX, MJ ;
SCHWARTZ, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 125 (07) :911-914
[2]   DID PRETERM DELIVERIES CONTINUE TO DECREASE IN FRANCE IN THE 1980S [J].
BREART, G ;
BLONDEL, B ;
TUPPIN, P ;
GRANDJEAN, H ;
KAMINSKI, M .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) :296-306
[3]   THE QUALITY AND COMPLETENESS OF BIRTH-WEIGHT AND GESTATIONAL-AGE DATA IN COMPUTERIZED BIRTH FILES [J].
DAVID, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1980, 70 (09) :964-973
[4]   Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy [J].
Gardosi, J ;
Geirsson, RT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (09) :933-936
[5]   Errors in gestational age:: Evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy [J].
Gjessing, HK ;
Skjærven, R ;
Wilcox, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (02) :213-218
[6]   PREMATURITY, POSTDATES, AND GROWTH-RETARDATION - THE INFLUENCE OF USE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY ON REPORTED GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
DAVIS, RO ;
CUTTER, GR ;
HOFFMAN, HJ ;
BRUMFIELD, CG ;
FOSTER, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 160 (02) :462-470
[7]  
GUERRERO R, 1969, LANCET, V2, P268
[8]   BIAS IN STUDIES OF PRETERM AND POSTTERM DELIVERY DUE TO ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL-AGE [J].
HENRIKSEN, TB ;
WILCOX, AJ ;
HEDEGAARD, M ;
SECHER, NJ .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (05) :533-537
[9]   Early dating by ultrasound and perinatal outcome - a cohort study [J].
Hogberg, U ;
Larsson, N .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 76 (10) :907-912
[10]   Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994 [J].
Joseph, KS ;
Kramer, MS ;
Marcoux, S ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Wen, SW ;
Allen, A ;
Platt, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) :1434-1439