Evaluation of soil survey scale for zone development of site-specific nitrogen management

被引:91
作者
Franzen, DW [1 ]
Hopkins, DH
Sweeney, MD
Ulmer, MK
Halvorson, AD
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Soil Sci, Fargo, ND 58105 USA
[2] USDA, NRCS, Bismarck, ND 58501 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Ft Collins, CO 80522 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2002.0381
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Zone sampling for site-specific N application has been shown to be effective in North Dakota and other areas of the Great Plains. Printed and sometimes digitized soil surveys are presently available for most agricultural counties in the USA. Order 2 soil surveys generally have scales that range from 1:12 000 to 1:31680. These surveys were developed for general planning purposes. There is interest in using Order 2 soil surveys as a basis for delineating N management zone patterns, especially where the soil-mapping units have been digitized. This study was conducted to evaluate soil survey scales at the Order 1 (scale >1:15 840) and Order 2 level against grid- and topography-based zone sampling to determine whether soil surveys at these scales could be used to delineate N management zones for site-specific fertilizer application. Fields mapped at a finer scale (Order 1 survey) showed some similarity between mapping units and N management zones defined by topography. Order 2 soil-mapping units, which are the present mapping scale of most agricultural soil surveys, were often not similar to N management zones. Published Order 2 soil surveys should not be used to develop N management zones for site-specific agriculture unless the soil patterns are verified with other zone development tools of site-specific management. Alternatively, a major benefit of Order 1 soil surveys would be to reinforce or redefine apparent N management zones.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 389
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ATHERTON BC, 1999, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V51, P66
[2]   FARMING SOILS, NOT FIELDS - A STRATEGY FOR INCREASING FERTILIZER PROFITABILITY [J].
CARR, PM ;
CARLSON, GR ;
JACOBSEN, JS ;
NIELSEN, GA ;
SKOGLEY, EO .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (01) :57-61
[3]   Soil sampling strategies for estimating residual nitrogen [J].
Clay, DE ;
Carlson, CG ;
BrixDavis, K ;
Oolman, J ;
Berg, B .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1997, 10 (03) :446-452
[4]  
Dahnke W. C., 1990, Soil testing and plant analysis., P45
[5]  
Ferguson R. B., 1996, Precision agriculture. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 23-26 June 1996., P13
[6]   Soil Nutrient Relationships with Topography as Influenced by Crop [J].
Franzen D.W. ;
Hofman V.L. ;
Cihacek L.J. ;
Swenson L.J. .
Precision Agriculture, 1999, 1 (2) :167-183
[7]   Field soil sampling density for variable rate fertilization [J].
Franzen, DW ;
Peck, TR .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1995, 8 (04) :568-574
[8]   Topography-based sampling compared with grid sampling in the northern Great Plains [J].
Franzen, DW ;
Cihacek, LJ ;
Hofman, VL ;
Swenson, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1998, 11 (03) :364-370
[9]  
Franzen DW, 1999, PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, PTS A AND B, P281
[10]  
FRANZEN DW, 1996, P 26 N CENTR EXT IND, P41