Nationwide continuous quality improvement using clinical indicators: The Danish National Indicator Project

被引:178
作者
Mainz, J [1 ]
Krog, BR [1 ]
Bjornshave, B [1 ]
Bartels, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Danish Natl Indicatior Project, Hojbjerg, Denmark
关键词
clinical indicators; indicator monitoring; quality improvement; quality of care; standards of care;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzh031
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. In most countries there is no mandatory national system to track the quality of care delivered to the citizens. This paper describes an example of a national indicator project that aims at documenting and improving the quality of care nationwide. Analysis. The Danish National Indicator Project was established in 2000 as a nationwide multidisciplinary quality improvement project. From 2000 to 2002, disease-specific clinical indicators and standards were developed for six diseases (stroke, hip fracture, schizophrenia, acute gastrointestinal surgery, heart failure, and lung cancer). Indicators and standards have been implemented in all clinical units and departments in Denmark treating patients with the six diseases, and participation is mandatory. All clinical units and departments receive their results every month. National and regional audit processes are organized to explain the results and to prepare implementation of improvements. All results are published in order to inform the public, and to give patients and relatives the opportunity to make informed choices. Conclusion. The surveillance of health care quality is greatly aided by the use of relevant quantitative indicators. This paper describes how it is possible to organize nationwide monitoring using clinical indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:I45 / I50
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SYSTEMS RATE STRENGT
[2]   The urgent need to improve health care quality - Institute of medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality [J].
Chassin, MR ;
Galvin, RW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :1000-1005
[3]   QUALITY OF MEDICAL-CARE [J].
DONABEDIAN, A .
SCIENCE, 1978, 200 (4344) :856-864
[4]   The risks of risk adjustment [J].
Iezzoni, LI .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19) :1600-1607
[5]   100 apples divided by 15 red herrings: A cautionary tale from the mid-19th century on comparing hospital mortality rates [J].
Iezzoni, LI .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 124 (12) :1079-1085
[7]   Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care [J].
Mant, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 13 (06) :475-480
[8]   Developing a clinical performance measure [J].
McGlynn, EA ;
Asch, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 14 (03) :14-21
[9]   The outcomes utility index: will outcomes data tell us what we want to know? [J].
McGlynn, EA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 10 (06) :485-490
[10]  
Palmer RH, 1998, INT J QUAL HEALTH C, V10, P477